Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 15:31:46 +0100
Message-ID: <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E828AD07@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de>
In-Reply-To: <58773.51665.qm@web86507.mail.ird.yahoo.com>
Thread-Topic: AW: LF: Influence of a TX antenna to a small rx antenna
Thread-Index: AcqG64Qf9ZhDaM5lQO2qEJ4h/8YKTQA3k1nw
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= <schaefer@hst.tu-darmstadt.de>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: AW: AW: LF: Influence of a TX antenna to a small rx antenna
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


Hi Alan, ;-)
No, breakfast was fine like always, perhaps even a little better ;-)
What about finbar? Is he still enthusiastic QRV on 137? I have never done=
 a QSO to EI yet and would be glad to get that in my log!
And we both, we also haven=B4t done a try yet ;-)
What do you think about the antiparallel diodes as a solution for decoupli=
ng, I wrote in the second half of my last report?

73 es HNY! Stefan/DK7FC


-----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacks=
heep.org] Im Auftrag von ALAN MELIA
Gesendet: Sonntag, 27. Dezember 2009 12:51
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Betreff: Re: AW: LF: Influence of a TX antenna to a small rx antenna

Hi Stefan I hope it does not give you indigestion :-))

Good luck with it.....all LF sites are different so in general require dif=
ferent detailed solutions. It seemed generally to be sufficient to de-tune=
 the unused antenna to reduce the interaction to low levels.

Best Wishes for Dx in the New Year
Alan G3NYK