Return-Path: Received: from rly-md07.mx.aol.com (rly-md07.mail.aol.com [172.20.29.145]) by air-md03.mail.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILINMD031-9164b363d2aa0; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 11:43:35 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-md07.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMD076-9164b363d2aa0; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 11:43:24 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NOZio-0005kj-Fd for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 16:42:30 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NOZio-0005ka-2k for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 16:42:30 +0000 Received: from lnx503.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de ([130.83.156.232]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NOZim-0005C6-3M for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 16:42:30 +0000 Received: from FILE-SERVER-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de (File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de [130.83.212.129]) by lnx503.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de (8.14.2/8.14.2/HRZ/PMX) with SMTP id nBQGgQTG018750 for ; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 17:42:26 +0100 (envelope-from schaefer@hst.tu-darmstadt.de) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de) by FILE-SERVER-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de with AVK MailGateway; for ; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 17:42:26 +0100 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 17:42:29 +0100 Message-ID: <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E828AD01@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> In-Reply-To: <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E828AD00@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: LF/MF Thread-Index: AcqGGFYF9XxzmBnkSPGa7Jdvc9EERwAMDxCQAABsNKA= From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= To: X-AVK-Virus-Check: AVB 19.647;26.12.2009 X-PMX-TU: seen v0.99a by 5.5.8.383112, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2009.12.26.162716 X-PMX-SPAMCHECK: outgoing mail X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: LF: AW: LF/MF X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Oh, now i can see why ;-) "LF:" is inserted automatically... 73... =20 -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacks= heep.org] Im Auftrag von Stefan Sch=E4fer Gesendet: Samstag, 26. Dezember 2009 17:36 An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Betreff: LF: LF/MF Why are the topics affecting 500 kHz not marked as "MF: ..." in the subjec= t? I thought this is the reason why we write "LF: ..." in the subject of mail= s affecting 137 kHZ? Or have I misunderstood "the rules"? Stefan/DK7FC