Return-Path: Received: from rly-dd08.mx.aol.com (rly-dd08.mail.aol.com [172.19.141.155]) by air-dd03.mail.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILINDD034-b954b2c30142c1; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:45:16 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-dd08.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDD087-b954b2c30142c1; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:44:54 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NLoI5-0008GS-Mo for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 01:39:29 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NLoI5-0008GJ-0C for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 01:39:29 +0000 Received: from imr-mb01.mx.aol.com ([64.12.207.164]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NLoL7-00082l-Bd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 01:42:38 +0000 Received: from imo-ma04.mx.aol.com (imo-ma04.mx.aol.com [64.12.78.139]) by imr-mb01.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id nBJ1gtjx016360 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:42:55 -0500 Received: from G4gvw@aol.com by imo-ma04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.5.) id l.d48.65f369f0 (56032) for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:42:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.68] ([92.18.91.54]) by cia-md08.mx.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMD086-dae04b2c2f967d; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:42:53 -0500 From: g4gvw To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: References: <914980.30417.qm@web28108.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <004e01ca8008$e5c13a60$6402a8c0@e7010> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 01:42:50 +0000 Message-Id: <1261186970.19260.12.camel@pat-compaq-evo> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: G4gvw@aol.com X-Karma: unknown: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Re: UK - Update - Special Research Permits (501 to 504 kHz band) Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Hi All, As someone who used to be professionally engaged in negotiating with the aforesaid regulator in its many incarnations/reincarnations prior to becoming Ofcomm, believe me it ain't easy! However, it is appreciated that each country and legislation, have their own (sometimes peculiar) approaches to the problems posed by demanding spectrum allocation. Some of us are extremely fortunate to have the talented and tenacious advocates that achieve so much against often quite incredible pressures from other interests. What is often forgotten is that some of these guys are doing this work unrewarded, in their own time and sometimes at odds with the commercial interests of their employers! For obvious reasons they cannot say this stuff on their own behalf but maybe, at this seasonal time we can all raise a glass and say THANK YOU! On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 18:20 +0000, Graham wrote: > Tnx Walter > > Yes , we seem to of done quite well considering , I think the only > gray area was the approach / marketing of the allocation where as > operations where initially viewed as a follow on from 136 and as > such its possible that it did not attract a wider response, where > as it very soon became apparent that the band was more similar > to 1.8 MHz in terms of coverage and the requirements for large > arrays and power level did not materialise and in fact the compact > array has provided most if not all of the Dx worked on the band to > date , ''even'' Gus is using a antenna system that is within > the boundary of his own house and is still fractional compared to > the wave length, once I had modified my old 80 ft total inverted L > with loading coil and top capacity section , 50 to 100 watts > provided amazing coverage and performance on 1.8 & 3.5 also > increased significantly .. unintended consequence ! > > Back in the 1970's a old friend of mine , long passed, who > introduced me to vhf radio 2 & 4 mtr am G3SX always maintained > that the 500 K / 600 mtr band was the original armature band in > the period between the 1914/1945 war's and the marine service, > once spark had been phased out , took over the band and forced the > armature operation hf to the new fangled 1.8 and higher > > So may be the tapping gang where just keeping it free for us > after all .. 70 years was long enough ! > > 73 - G .. > > > From: Walter und Marianne Staubach > Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 5:38 PM > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: LF: Re: UK - Update - Special Research Permits (501 to 504 > kHz band) > > > Congrats to All on MF in G-Land. I would like we had RSGB and OFCOM in > Germany. > Merry Christmas > Walter DI2AG / DJ2LF > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: M0FMT > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 12:39 PM > Subject: LF: UK - Update - Special Research Permits (501 to > 504 kHz band) > > > FYI 16|12|09 > Update - Special Research Permits (501 to 504 kHz band) > Following representations made by the Radio Society of Great > Britain and negotiations by Ofcom with the Maritime and > Coastguard Agency, Ofcom has decided to extend the period of > Notices of Variation (NoVs) to the licence for operation in > the 501 to 504 kHz band until 29 February 2012. The maximum > effective radiated power (e.r.p.) limit is maintained at 10 > dBW (10 W). Existing NoVs are due to expire at the end of > February 2010. > There have been no reports of interference and investigation > has shown that a radiated power of 10 dBW is not likely to > cause interference. Moreover, NoV holders are permitted to > operate only subject to causing no interference. > Special Research Permits under a Notice of Variation to the > Licence are made available to holders of Full Amateur Licences > on a case by case basis to applicants who can demonstrate a > genuine interest in experimentation at these frequencies and > provide adequate supporting documentation for assessment. > Due to the usage of the spectrum around the 500 kHz bands, > applicants should pay special attention to demonstrating > technical and operational competence in terms of transmitting > within the frequency band and Effective Radiated Power > (e.r.p.) parameters agreed with Ofcom. Previous experience at > 73 kHz as well as 136 kHz will be considered desirable in this > respect to ensure adequate steps are taken to limit any > potential interference. > Ofcom will monitor any interference reports and also consider > limiting numbers if necessary in reviewing operation in the > band. On no account will an e.r.p. level of greater than 10 > dBW be permitted under any circumstance. > The standard application form (OfW306) for a Special Research > Permit can be downloaded at: > http://www.ofcom.org.uk/radiocomms/ifi/licensing/classes/amateur/applications/ofw306.pdf > A fresh NoV will automatically be issued to existing NoV > holders; new applications are not required in this instance. > Should a fresh NoV not be required or if you are in possession > of an NoV which is not required, please inform the Ofcom > Licensing Centre stating your name, call sign and Licence > number preferably by e-mail to licensingcentre@ofcom.org.uk or > alternatively by post to the address at the end of the text. > Form OfW306 is also available on request from the Ofcom > Licensing Centre at: > Ofcom Licensing Centre > Amateur Radio > Riverside House > 2a Southwark Bridge Road > London SE1 9HA > Tel: 020 7981 3131 > > 73 es GL petefmt > > > -- 73 es gd dx de pat g4gvw qth nr felixstowe uk (east coast, county of suffolk)