Return-Path: Received: from rly-mb01.mx.aol.com (rly-mb01.mail.aol.com [172.21.131.154]) by air-mb08.mail.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILINMB084-ce54b1bd4e63aa; Sun, 06 Dec 2009 10:59:51 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-mb01.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMB011-ce54b1bd4e63aa; Sun, 06 Dec 2009 10:59:35 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NHJV8-00051m-NN for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 Dec 2009 15:58:22 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NHJV8-00051d-4P for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 Dec 2009 15:58:22 +0000 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by relay3.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NHJV6-0000lT-8y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 Dec 2009 15:58:22 +0000 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 06 Dec 2009 15:58:13 -0000 Received: from p5DD352B5.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO Clemens04) [93.211.82.181] by mail.gmx.net (mp037) with SMTP; 06 Dec 2009 16:58:13 +0100 X-Authenticated: #17214767 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+PxtFdOOGPfgTocao0y08DciSAUMmUvXz7CxaxRq ulz8nvMbR10wVQ Message-ID: <007601ca768c$ea8c4240$0201a8c0@Clemens04> From: "Clemens Paul" To: References: <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E828AAF4@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <1259777260.4b16acec27aa8@imp.netikka.net> <4B179D08.3030706@ukonline.co.uk> Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 16:58:10 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3598 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.52 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: Re: LF, reducing common-mode noise Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Peter, with the AIM 4170 you've got one of the best impedance measuring tools which are affordable for amateurs. I can this tell you from my own hands-on experience, also in comparison with a professional albeit vintage HP VNA from 100kHz to 110Mz. Meanwhile I'm using here also the "two port brother" of AIM,the VNA 2180. Regarding common mode "chokes",the AIM will show you, that when you use high µ cores (zinc-mangan), the "choke" converts to a more or less highly resistive impedance with a small capacitive reactance above its self-resonant frequency. The point is that this frequency is surprisingly low,often below 100kHz,of course strongly depending on the properties of the used ferrite mix and the number of turns. Generally one can distinguish between three types of common mode "chokes". 1.) "Chokes" made of lossy very high µ cores or beads which represent a resistive impedance from MW to 30MHz.Their advantage is that they are broadbanded due to their resisitive character and therefore have no series (or parallel which would not hurt) resonances in this frequency area. 2.)True chokes made of say µ125 material.You can design them such that the self resonant frequency is at about 15MHz so that the impedance drops gradually to the lower (inductive) and higher (capacitive) end of the HF spectrum. 3.) Tuned "chokes" i.e. parallel resonant circuits.They offer the highest possible impedance but are confined to one band. So one can make his choice which solution fits best for the intended application. Anyway, the AIM always tells you over frequency what you are doing. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Dodd" To: Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 12:12 PM Subject: LF: LF, reducing common-mode noise >A couple of weeks ago I asked how can one measure the mu of ferrite > rings. I received very good information via this reflector for which I > would like to thank those who contributed. > I was experimenting with various common-mode chokes, particularly on how > to measure their characteristics using the AIM 4170. > I was advised that the capacitance of the measuring setup might make the > measurements invalid. I introduced various values of capacitance to > measure these effects and by extrapolation concluded that my measurement > method was acceptable. > Inserting large values of capacitance across the common mode choke > destroyed its characteristic as a choke and turned it into a selective > tuned circuit. This arrangement appears to reduce common-mode noise at > the frequency to which it is tuned but is only effective at that > frequency. The main advantage is that you don't need such large values > of inductance. > > Regards > > Peter, G3LDO > > > > > > Paul-Henrik wrote: >> Hello Stefan, LF >> >> I can not overemphasize the possible need to keep the feedline "clean" and free >> of RFI that may otherwise make it's way to any active whip antenna. >> >> My first attempts at deploying the PA0RDT Mini-Whip here were unsuccessful and >> disappointing due to the fact that some of the RFI I tried to avoid was >> conducted from the shack out to the antenna along the coax. This may among >> other things depend on what kind of radio the antenna is connected to. >> >> If in doubt, my advice is to use one common mode choke where the coax leaves the >> house and to ground the coax braid just behind it using an independent >> earth-stake and then further a second common-mode choke just before the >> feedline goes vertically up to the antenna. >> >> For common mode chokes I use large high-mu ferrite rings that can take 20 turns >> of RG-58 or up to 45 turns of RG-174 but smaller rings can be used with RG-174. >> There is a picture here of the first test-choke I used for tracking down my >> noise: http://peditio.net/utility/Attachments/choke_sml.jpg >> >> This may be "overkill" in most installations but I'm sure some users can gain >> from these extra measures just as I did. >> >> >> >> BR >> >> Paul-Henrik, OH1LSQ >> >> >> >> >> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eingehende eMail ist virenfrei. Von AVG überprüft - www.avg.de Version: 9.0.709 / Virendatenbank: 270.14.90/2540 - Ausgabedatum: 12/02/09 08:33:00