Return-Path: Received: from rly-mg07.mx.aol.com (rly-mg07.mail.aol.com [172.20.83.113]) by air-mg04.mail.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILINMG042-a224b09954d338; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:47:50 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-mg07.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMG074-a224b09954d338; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:47:27 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NCIOH-0005OX-Bz for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:46:33 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NCIOG-0005OO-Sw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:46:32 +0000 Received: from mail-ew0-f223.google.com ([209.85.219.223]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NCIOG-0005ne-4U for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:46:32 +0000 Received: by ewy23 with SMTP id 23so714880ewy.4 for ; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:46:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=g3SudRCnQTDyN8MgqTCt+pE052peCfZTVlqMhVWLr4c=; b=fb35MJ8flkmp4iHszza4A1qZB9yoK2d0gTlxGAuoFaGNpPJW1O4Dii8+N9n/7LWSqz HRjof1tWKhZ4u0blcRn2IbywGhZ9wecvD586Oy447HF65yz4XwCkX7b0BW3T4uuO2/D4 UFLa+v2L3NYXG6pdHMOV1KsOE3e0d/I0JUPBM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=mspF+sWZ2NrBCvoc+rx1EHvln0wpYjkowUrNFz76ZxiFYoX21WPPcmwhQXMY08LZU+ v2PSYpczCdPsJf1qWJW2g1EBxL3GZccytZCqJFgOO/uJk9gvTgKgx2COcdzZ9eUguP6d WomFUz6cxmtu2rfT9dY8Smfr0/Q/Fb8GIyUkc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.15.14 with SMTP id i14mr3881131eba.50.1258919186463; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:46:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <00bb01ca6ba7$dd53d650$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> References: <00ad01ca6ba5$82fec130$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <00bb01ca6ba7$dd53d650$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:46:26 +0100 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anton_B=E4rtschi?= To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Karma: unknown: DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: G3KEV Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174bdcb6e8faea0478faf64a X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m277.2 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --0015174bdcb6e8faea0478faf64a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tnx Mal. The reason for the weaker signal is simple: I moved to another QT= H five years ago. Here I have not the possibilities I had before. No Helix Vertical with a big top hat, just a modest L-Antenna, 12m high with a tota= l wire lenght of about 50m. Already on 160m it is not a "big gun", hi. 73 de Toni 2009/11/22 mal hamilton > You are OOO copy now at 1912 z > mal/g3kev > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* mal hamilton > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Sent:* Sunday, November 22, 2009 6:56 PM > *Subject:* LF: Re: G3KEV > > Tony > Tnx ur call but the qsb was severe. We have worked before on cw so do no= t > understand why u are so weak at present. > > de mal/g3kev > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Anton B=E4rtschi > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Sent:* Sunday, November 22, 2009 5:13 PM > *Subject:* LF: G3KEV > > You are "O" here, dear Mal, ufb. Sorry we couldn't make it. Probably my > antenna is to small. It seems to me, that my limit is around 800-900km= on > Longwave. Power is 1kW and I can't get much higher. But one day, we may= get > the permission for 500kHz and there it should be much easier, even in no= rmal > CW. > 73 de Toni, HB9ASB > > --0015174bdcb6e8faea0478faf64a Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tnx Mal. The reason for the weaker signal is simple: I moved to another QT= H five years ago. Here I have not the possibilities I had before. No Helix= Vertical with a big top hat, just a modest L-Antenna, 12m high with a tot= al wire lenght of about 50m. Already on 160m it is not a "big gun&quo= t;, hi.
73 de Toni

2009/11/22 mal hamilton <g3kevmal@talktal= k.net>
You are OOO copy now at 1912 z
mal/g3kev
=A0
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 mal=20 hamilton
Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009= 6:56=20 PM
Subject: LF: Re: G3KEV

Tony
Tnx ur call but the qsb was severe.= We have=20 worked before on cw so do not understand why u are so weak at=20 present.
=A0
de mal/g3kev
=A0
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Anton B=E4rtschi=20
Sent: Sunday, November 22, 20= 09 5:13=20 PM
Subject: LF: G3KEV

You are "O" here, dear Mal, ufb. Sorry we cou= ldn't make it.=20 Probably my antenna is to small. It seems to me, that my limit is arou= nd=20 800-900km on Longwave. Power is 1kW and I can't get much higher.= But one=20 day, we may get the permission for 500kHz and there it should be much= =20 easier, even in normal CW.
73 de Toni, HB9ASB

--0015174bdcb6e8faea0478faf64a--