Return-Path: Received: from rly-md09.mx.aol.com (rly-md09.mail.aol.com [172.20.29.147]) by air-md07.mail.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILINMD073-9244af8328338e; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:17:34 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-md09.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMD094-9244af8328338e; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:17:25 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1N7VyX-00046w-7i for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:16:13 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1N7VyW-00046n-Nh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:16:12 +0000 Received: from mx.omskcity.com ([79.133.160.2]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1N7Vxd-0008OI-Gc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:15:18 +0000 Received: from noname.nodomain.nowhere (host209.161-133-79.sotline.ru [79.133.161.209]) by mx.omskcity.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id nA9FG3Xl034238 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 21:16:05 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from fitec@omskcity.com) Received: from localhost (fitec@localhost) by noname.nodomain.nowhere (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA00267 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 22:18:14 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: noname.nodomain.nowhere: fitec owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 22:18:14 +0000 (GMT) From: "Alexander S. Yurkov" To: rsgb In-Reply-To: <026601ca609f$82671260$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.1.8 (mx.omskcity.com [79.133.160.2]); Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:16:07 +0600 (OMST) X-Karma: unknown: X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12=1.498 Subject: Re: LF: TREES Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) It is simple:-) Trees effect to a loop is much lower then such an effect to an E-antenna. This is why loop is better then E-antenna in bad enviroment (trees). While E-antenna is better then loop of the same dimensions if trees are absent. On Sun, 8 Nov 2009, mal hamilton wrote: > Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 18:15:49 -0000 > From: mal hamilton > Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > To: rsgb > Subject: LF: TREES > > According to some USA stn they thread and hang their loops through tree branches. This info has appeared in the past on this reflector. > Are UK trees different from those in the USA ? > Apart from me no one else in the UK seemed to think this was a problem !! > G3KEV > Regards, Alexander