Return-Path: Received: from rly-ma02.mx.aol.com (rly-ma02.mail.aol.com [172.20.116.46]) by air-ma02.mail.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILINMA021-8954afc8738260; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:08:18 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-ma02.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMA027-8954afc8738260; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:07:54 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1N8hoc-00089w-Vb for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:06:54 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1N8hoc-00089n-1C for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:06:54 +0000 Received: from idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca ([24.71.223.10]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1N8hoa-0001BX-Dp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:06:54 +0000 Received: from pd2ml1so-ssvc.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.141.139]) by pd3mo1so-svcs.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 12 Nov 2009 15:06:44 -0700 X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.0 c=1 a=BgIo6cWXEGMA:10 a=bMPSwsB01Q4O/CPJ8uTuaw==:17 a=F3M5lZpKAAAA:8 a=f0RPBRECAAAA:8 a=pSDxxfrZAAAA:8 a=UliUF1eLxKXp51QQJlcA:9 a=lmwuGxTXkxiJcH5BSaoA:7 a=-8gLXowjzjEjyfs5GYM1e3mjuT0A:4 a=wk6s2zzMB60A:10 a=dn95DZbOqnwPSVB7:21 a=HvDZQeyFx3c1W-w1:21 a=BrDiTsk0AAAA:8 a=GM0rcODgsD86dDK29gUA:9 a=qt1TPkqS6fUW_GO2Mx0A:7 a=WiIxiK9xS36T6qJv_y8yxMSs3-gA:4 a=-hJg1tCh9CgA:10 a=Ss17ffG1SPc8rrHZ:21 a=iqeY42m6j7AZqOlW:21 Received: from unknown (HELO Jordan1) ([68.147.20.14]) by pd2ml1so-dmz.prod.shaw.ca with SMTP; 12 Nov 2009 15:06:43 -0700 Message-ID: From: "Jordan" To: References: <563642.98089.qm@web28101.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:06:43 -0700 Organization: VE6ZT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Karma: unknown: X-Spam-Score: 3.5 (+++) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK=3.36,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,HTML_TAG_EXIST_TBODY=0.126 Subject: LF: Are the new VE stations able to qso with other amature stations ?? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0035_01CA63A9.BEEA00F0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.0 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 ------=_NextPart_000_0035_01CA63A9.BEEA00F0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm still trying to figure out why my request for the Experimental Per= mit was denied... If I recall, I was told there wasn't anything new to= be learned at that frequency, and that my region (VE6) wasn't particu= larly interesting.=20 I wonder who gets to decide who gets to operate...? I know it's not RA= C, although they do provide the paperwork. 73...Jordan VE6ZT ----- Original Message -----=20 From: M0FMT=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 2:55 PM Subject: Re: LF: Are the new VE stations able to qso with other amat= ure stations ?? Just more boring old Beacon stations claging up MF.....look on= RAC web site... http://www.rac.ca/ ........ 2008-11-10 Canadian Amateurs on 600 Metres Industry Canada has accepted= an RAC proposal whereby selected Canadian radio amateurs would be per= mitted to operate in the vicinity of 500 kHz. These amateur operations= would support Canada's efforts to action a proposal on the agenda of= the 2011 World Radio Conference (WRC2011) which, if adopted, would cr= eate an amateur allocation in the 600-meter band. Industry Canada have= authorized RAC to recommend amateurs who would be licensed to operate= in the 504 to 509 kHz band with a maximum power of 20 watts ERP and= bandwidth up to 1 kHz. Stations operating in this band would be techn= ically operating under Special Developmental Licenses although they wo= uld all be radio amateurs. Distinct call signs would be used and the= licenses would be renewable annually subject to the amateur demonstra= ting the research he has carried out. More information will follow sho= rtly in the pages of TCA or via subsequent bulletins. Bryan Rawlings= VE3QN/VE2QNN Radio Amateurs of/du Canada, Inc.=20 73 petefmt --- On Thu, 12/11/09, Graham wrote: From: Graham Subject: LF: Are the new VE stations able to qso with other= amature stations ?? To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Thursday, 12 November, 2009, 21:43 Can anyone clarify the situation as to who can work who=20 is this the same as the USA ?=20 Tnx - G .. =20 From the IARU web site=20 As of 30 October 2009 Canada issued two licences in the Deve= lopmental Service in the range 504-509 kHz. a.. VE1ZZ has been assigned VX9PSO and is reported on 504.= 6 kHz=20 b.. VO1NA has been assigned VX9MRC and is reported on 507.= 77 and 508.5 kHz Two more stations, VE3OHH and VE7BDQ, are expected to become= active soon.=20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0035_01CA63A9.BEEA00F0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm still trying to figure out why my request= for the=20 Experimental Permit was denied... If I recall, I was told there wasn't= anything=20 new to be learned at that frequency, and that my region (VE6) wasn't= =20 particularly interesting.
I wonder who gets to decide who gets to operat= e...? I know=20 it's not RAC, although they do provide the paperwork.
 73...Jordan VE6ZT
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 M0FMT=
Sent: Thursday, November 12,= 2009 2:55=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Are the new= VE stations=20 able to qso with other amature stations ??

Just more boring old Beacon stations claging up MF.....lo= ok on RAC=20 web site... http://www.rac.ca/<= /A> =20 ........
 

2008-11-10

Canadian Amateurs on 600 Metres Industry Canada has accep= ted an RAC=20 proposal whereby selected Canadian radio amateurs would be per= mitted to=20 operate in the vicinity of 500 kHz. These amateur operations= would=20 support Canada's efforts to action a proposal on the agenda of= the 2011=20 World Radio Conference (WRC2011) which, if adopted, would crea= te an=20 amateur allocation in the 600-meter band. Industry Canada have= =20 authorized RAC to recommend amateurs who would be licensed to= operate in=20 the 504 to 509 kHz band with a maximum power of 20 watts ERP= and=20 bandwidth up to 1 kHz. Stations operating in this band would= be=20 technically operating under Special Developmental Licenses alt= hough they=20 would all be radio amateurs. Distinct call signs would be used= and the=20 licenses would be renewable annually subject to the amateur=20 demonstrating the research he has carried out. More informatio= n will=20 follow shortly in the pages of TCA or via subsequent bulletins= . Bryan=20 Rawlings VE3QN/VE2QNN Radio Amateurs of/du Canada, Inc.
 
 
73 petefmt

--- On Thu, 12/11/09, Graham=20 <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:

From:=20 Graham <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk>
Subject: LF: Are= the new VE=20 stations able to qso with other amature stations ??
To:= =20 rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Date: Thursday, 12 November,= 2009,=20 21:43

Can anyone clarify the  situat= ion as=20 to  who can work who
is this the  same as the = USA=20 ? 
 
Tnx - G ..   
From the  IARU = web site=20
As of 30 October 2009 Canada issued two licences in the= =20 Developmental Service in the range 504-509 kHz.
  • VE1ZZ has been assigned VX9PSO and is reported on 504.= 6 kHz=20
  • VO1NA has been assigned VX9MRC and is reported on 507.= 77 and=20 508.5 kHz
Two more stations, VE3OHH and VE7BDQ, are expected= to become=20 active soon.=20



------=_NextPart_000_0035_01CA63A9.BEEA00F0--