Return-Path: Received: from rly-md07.mx.aol.com (rly-md07.mail.aol.com [172.20.29.145]) by air-md02.mail.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILINMD024-9134afd73771e8; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:56:09 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-md07.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMD073-9134afd73771e8; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:55:53 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1N8xWl-0002mx-B4 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:53:31 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1N8xWk-0002mo-Lr for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:53:30 +0000 Received: from smtp5.freeserve.com ([193.252.22.128]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1N8xWi-0005qd-1x for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:53:30 +0000 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3408.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 8AFF21C00085 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:53:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3408.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 7D9C71C00086 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:53:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from AGB (unknown [91.109.59.9]) by mwinf3408.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with SMTP id 39E681C00085 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:53:21 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20091113145321237.39E681C00085@mwinf3408.me.freeserve.com Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: <2EB9AB3966984B91BB0C369B32CF12FC@AGB> <4AFCC936.9060800@telus.net> <4AFD125A.3060402@sighthound.demon.co.uk> <4AFD6D5F.3020302@telus.net> In-Reply-To: <4AFD6D5F.3020302@telus.net> Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:53:20 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8089.726 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8089.726 X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR=0.276 Subject: Re: LF: Are the new VE stations able to qso with other amature stations ?? Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=5.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Scott SO.... Matter and antimatter cannot coexist at close range for more than a small fraction of a second because they collide with and annihilate each other, releasing large quantities of energy in the form of gamma rays Got it now .. gamma rays are electromagnetic ..hence radio waves are produced .. which may suffer (constructive interference) or (destructive interference) resulting in large variations in amplitude at the point of observation ..... Thanks ! G .. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Scott Tilley" Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 2:29 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: Are the new VE stations able to qso with other amature stations ?? > > Hi John > > VX is in developmental service (same idea as US stations), EI in amateur > service... Like positive and negative antimatter they don't mix. > > 73 Scott > > > John P-G wrote: >> Scott Tilley wrote: >>> Hi Graham >>> >>> All Canadian 600m stations are operating under COMMERCIAL Developmental >>> Licenses and are not able to communicate with the Amateur Service. >> >> So VX9MRC shouldn't be having regular CW QSOs with EI0CF? >> >> Still confused.... >> >> John >> GM4SLV >> >> > >