Return-Path: Received: from rly-me09.mx.aol.com (rly-me09.mail.aol.com [172.20.83.43]) by air-me03.mail.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILINME032-9d64afd86f755; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:19:34 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-me09.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINME092-9d64afd86f755; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:19:06 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1N8yqT-0003a6-9e for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:17:57 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1N8yqS-0003Zx-QV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:17:56 +0000 Received: from web28103.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.182.123]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1N8yqS-0007bp-H6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:17:56 +0000 Received: (qmail 39068 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Nov 2009 16:17:50 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1258129069; bh=/P129sEOPBPhCaPHF/q7polIk3EgA8/zUuSYWBfVHtg=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=LHys0QAWqPhfshWl87e/CMn6riN6Hh1qH3M9m4Keqqece7VgCUAYHiVmkOQfDV7hTHWENYyZCXr8g4YarZXtTqGYZ2PMd+DlvrE4A3SZ28FjCRgh4HgmX46O/qXJqu8850ZDNc9lTcHcKfH+I8gTEpFJWEre0rhOhR0G1BSmP14= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=C6DoYDpGxMohgHzXKkEyJgr/IlLiyN8AlM+HmgMHC77+UMamSd0Br/TiEkLPQG2z5BZEJhI2QR6lXJ+jGWEP8j1mjGes8POZHIy8+gD9n9XY4LBQz7LHleTZOSHAD+7xocsiBgn85fzqtnNYnqCQe/OUj3j2UWpqxPRsDIt3PSU=; Message-ID: <961313.39040.qm@web28103.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: xCo6zwsVM1n322dl2XRtsZ77Mi5vU0C4LBxjl9j9hZN5oHJ222wQ2uSvVhNI.379.LS4OZduYbMugPRoA33ckqKPuuRcA3nTULBsUjYabVjkJhp.Wu7U2UsG__G2x.StZcoHoqoxwvnYf.NQi9qgEbgTtr7lRAfCGkmJLaFUiihflPOdAgcMAk4CKJ5BTU66NQF0WBxCLv2BrT8hdgV0xjyH2zTm6XUvc3qC4tepFIzhTFxnJl1NRlqBz6l6xeaQA5.39sdsqQsQfW2uiLYMzfMJuJVXtT6glf1EZJwBouISDNywI2oI9ur5INkjhK7L2ltRFVZUVFdLbw-- Received: from [86.152.86.139] by web28103.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:17:49 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/8.1.6 YahooMailWebService/0.7.361.4 Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:17:49 -0800 (PST) From: M0FMT To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Karma: unknown: DomainKey-Status: good (testing) Subject: Re: LF: Are the new VE stations able to qso with other amature stations ?? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1182672792-1258129069=:39040" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d247.1 ; domain : yahoo.co.uk DKIM : pass --0-1182672792-1258129069=:39040 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi LF Group =A0 Putting Quantum Mechanics aside for a mo. I know this is bit academic sinc= e my chance of working the Americas on 500 is pretty remote but are these= stations Amateurs or not Amateurs? Are they actually Pirating but using= a commercial call?=20 =A0 The whole setup looks=A0decidedly dodgy to me. If they are Pirates how wou= ld it affect my license if the opportunity arose for me to work one and I= did? The only place I know where I am licensed work a non Amateur station= is on 5megs and that=A0can only be a UK Mill station. =A0 It's a question of how much you value your license I suppose. =A0 73 petefmt --- On Fri, 13/11/09, Graham wrote: From: Graham Subject: Re: LF: Are the new VE stations able to qso with other amature st= ations ?? To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Friday, 13 November, 2009, 14:53 Scott SO.... Matter and antimatter cannot coexist at close range for more than= a small fraction of a second because they collide with and annihilate eac= h other, releasing large quantities of energy in the form of gamma rays Got it=A0 now .. gamma rays are electromagnetic ..hence radio waves are pr= oduced .. which may suffer=A0 (constructive interference) or (destructive= interference) resulting in large variations in amplitude at the point of= observation ..... Thanks=A0 ! G .. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Scott Tilley" Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 2:29 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: Are the=A0 new VE stations able to=A0 qso=A0 with=A0 othe= r amature stations ?? >=20 > Hi John >=20 > VX is in developmental service (same idea as US stations), EI in amateur= service... Like positive and negative antimatter they don't mix. >=20 > 73 Scott >=20 >=20 > John P-G wrote: >> Scott Tilley wrote: >>> Hi Graham >>>=20 >>> All Canadian 600m stations are operating under COMMERCIAL Developmenta= l Licenses and are not able to communicate with the Amateur Service. >>=20 >> So VX9MRC shouldn't be having regular CW QSOs with EI0CF? >>=20 >> Still confused.... >>=20 >> John >> GM4SLV >>=20 >>=20 >=20 >=20 =20 --0-1182672792-1258129069=:39040 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi LF Group
 
Putting Quantum Mechanics aside for a mo. I know this is bit ac= ademic since my chance of working the Americas on 500 is pretty remote but= are these stations Amateurs or not Amateurs? Are they actually Pirating= but using a commercial call?
 
The whole setup looks decidedly dodgy to me. If they are= Pirates how would it affect my license if the opportunity arose for me to= work one and I did? The only place I know where I am licensed work a non= Amateur station is on 5megs and that can only be a UK Mill station.<= /SPAN>
 
It's a question of how much you value your license I suppose.
 
73 petefmt


--- On Fri, 13/11/09, Graham <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.u= k> wrote:

From: Graham <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk>Subject: Re: LF: Are the new VE stations able= to qso with other amature stations ??
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Date: Friday, 13 November, 2009, 14:53

Scott

SO.... Matter and antimatter cannot co= exist at close range for more than a small fraction of a second because th= ey collide with and annihilate each other, releasing large quantities of= energy in the form of gamma rays

Got it  now .. gamma rays ar= e electromagnetic ..hence radio waves are produced .. which may suffer&nbs= p; (constructive interference) or (destructive interference) resulting in= large variations in amplitude at the point of observation .....

Th= anks  !

G ..

------------------------------------------= --------
From: "Scott Tilley" <sthed475@telus.net>
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 2:29 PM=
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Subject: Re: LF: Are the = new VE stations able to  qso  with  other amature stations= ??

>
> Hi John
>
> VX is in developmental= service (same idea as US stations), EI in amateur service... Like positiv= e and negative antimatter they don't mix.
>
> 73 Scott
>= ;
>
> John P-G wrote:
>> Scott Tilley wrote:
>= ;>> Hi Graham
>>>
>>> All Canadian 600m sta= tions are operating under COMMERCIAL Developmental Licenses and are not ab= le to communicate with the Amateur Service.
>>
>> So VX= 9MRC shouldn't be having regular CW QSOs with EI0CF?
>>
>&= gt; Still confused....
>>
>> John
>> GM4SLV>>
>>
>
>




=20 --0-1182672792-1258129069=:39040--