Return-Path: Received: from rly-dg02.mx.aol.com (rly-dg02.mail.aol.com [172.19.151.86]) by air-dg04.mail.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILINDG044-5a64afd45502eb; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:39:12 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-dg02.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDG021-5a64afd45502eb; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:38:58 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1N8uTb-0001wa-Lz for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:38:03 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1N8uTb-0001wR-3q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:38:03 +0000 Received: from smtp5.freeserve.com ([193.252.22.152]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1N8uTZ-0003vv-4C for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:38:03 +0000 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3426.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 7C8B61C00082 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:37:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3426.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 6E9B31C00086 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:37:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from AGB (unknown [91.109.59.9]) by mwinf3426.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with SMTP id DBBA71C00082 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:37:50 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20091113113750900.DBBA71C00082@mwinf3426.me.freeserve.com Message-ID: <52D04D6834A64696BE0A3AA0F9003339@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <563642.98089.qm@web28101.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <001801ca63ec$609a7f50$0900a8c0@lark> In-Reply-To: <001801ca63ec$609a7f50$0900a8c0@lark> Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:37:49 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8089.726 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8089.726 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Are the new VE stations able to qso with other amature stations ?? Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Alan All is not quite as it seam's ! During the convoluted discussions with Offcomm , over the establishment of the GB4FPR 500 nov for a perm ant special event station .. which was established with the intent of conducting both experimental and normal armature radio activity's, the licensing officer at Offcom made the statement that 'he had no issues with normal armature activity on 500' and duly issued the nov to the station in time for the forth coming International Marconi Day. So for those who hold the uk 500 nov it would appeared though slightly restricted in bandwidth 'we' are perhaps the most empowered by the licensing authority's .. we even have a official beacon .. not that the others are not, its just that it did cross more than the countries boundary's when established. Three cheers to Offcom (and by the way can you do anything about the mains network adaptors please) G .. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Alan Melia" Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 11:02 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: Are the new VE stations able to qso with other amature stations ?? > > Graham its like our Offcomm....read it that it doesnt say they can't! Dont > ask or the answer is always NO, the safest response for a Civil Serpent > :-)) > > Alan G3NYK > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Graham" > To: > Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 10:33 PM > Subject: Re: LF: Are the new VE stations able to qso with other amature > stations ?? > > > Peter, > > I'm reading that .. but what am I reading ..is it yes or no ? > > G.. > > > From: M0FMT > Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 9:55 PM > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: Are the new VE stations able to qso with other amature > stations ?? > > > Just more boring old Beacon stations claging up MF.....look on RAC > web > site... http://www.rac.ca/ ........ > > 2008-11-10 > Canadian Amateurs on 600 Metres Industry Canada has accepted an RAC > proposal whereby selected Canadian radio amateurs would be permitted to > operate in the vicinity of 500 kHz. These amateur operations would support > Canada's efforts to action a proposal on the agenda of the 2011 World > Radio > Conference (WRC2011) which, if adopted, would create an amateur allocation > in the 600-meter band. Industry Canada have authorized RAC to recommend > amateurs who would be licensed to operate in the 504 to 509 kHz band with > a > maximum power of 20 watts ERP and bandwidth up to 1 kHz. Stations > operating > in this band would be technically operating under Special Developmental > Licenses although they would all be radio amateurs. Distinct call signs > would be used and the licenses would be renewable annually subject to the > amateur demonstrating the research he has carried out. More information > will > follow shortly in the pages of TCA or via subsequent bulletins. Bryan > Rawlings VE3QN/VE2QNN Radio Amateurs of/du Canada, Inc. > > > 73 petefmt > > --- On Thu, 12/11/09, Graham wrote: > > > From: Graham > Subject: LF: Are the new VE stations able to qso with other amature > stations ?? > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Date: Thursday, 12 November, 2009, 21:43 > > > Can anyone clarify the situation as to who can work who > is this the same as the USA ? > > Tnx - G .. > From the IARU web site > As of 30 October 2009 Canada issued two licences in the > Developmental Service in the range 504-509 kHz. > a.. VE1ZZ has been assigned VX9PSO and is reported on 504.6 kHz > b.. VO1NA has been assigned VX9MRC and is reported on 507.77 and > 508.5 kHz > Two more stations, VE3OHH and VE7BDQ, are expected to become active > soon. > > > > > > > >