Return-Path: Received: from rly-db07.mx.aol.com (rly-db07.mail.aol.com [172.19.130.82]) by air-db03.mail.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILINDB033-ad84afabb9d1fb; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:26:57 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-db07.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDB076-ad84afabb9d1fb; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:26:55 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1N8DCu-0002ME-0J for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:25:56 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1N8DCt-0002M5-FX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:25:55 +0000 Received: from imr-da02.mx.aol.com ([205.188.105.144]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1N8DCB-0005SD-0X for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:25:11 +0000 Received: from imo-da02.mx.aol.com (imo-da02.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.200]) by imr-da02.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id nABDPeP1004233 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:25:40 -0500 Received: from G4gvw@aol.com by imo-da02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.5.) id l.ca1.67636aed (56013) for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:25:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.64] ([92.23.134.203]) by cia-md07.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMD077-dacd4afabb50189; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:25:37 -0500 From: pat gillen To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <31E46023A2704DF8A4431C0B44BAE495@Hugh> References: <001101ca621e$dcdc3380$96949a80$@princeton.edu> <20091110192309.4v8agotbs0k0gocs@webmail6.kuleuven.be> <004a01ca6249$d91531e0$8b3f95a0$@princeton.edu> <20091110222951.cr4qtrqagcwcowok@webmail6.kuleuven.be> <4AFAAE9C.1070304@ukonline.co.uk> <31E46023A2704DF8A4431C0B44BAE495@Hugh> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:25:36 +0000 Message-Id: <1257945936.10404.7.camel@pat-desktop-dell> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: G4gvw@aol.com X-Karma: unknown: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Re: Ferrite characteristics Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Hi Peter, I tend to do something similar to Hugh but perhaps a little less "scientifically" viz.; When playing toroids etc. I determine which ones are successful for a particular application and use an LCR meter to measure the inductance of 5 turns of approx 14g copper and mark the toroid accordingly. My little stock is marked in this way and a note is made of the apps for which they were suitable (or in some cases unsuitable). I am sure there are much better ways but it gets me by. 73 de Pat g4gvw On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 12:55 +0000, Hugh_m0wye wrote: > Hi Peter, > In the past I have wound a few turns aound the core and measured the > Inductance. From this you can calculate the AL value, or "Inductance Factor" > in nH per turns squared. I measured the Inductance on an LCR meter, but you > could resonate the coil against a capacitor and use a GDO as you suggest. > > Number of turns = square root of (L / AL) where L is inductance in nH. > > From this you can compare to published figures, for example the RM series of > Ferrite cores (RS used to publish tables which included the AL value, in > their catalogues) > > 73 > Hugh M0WYE > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Peter Dodd" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 12:31 PM > Subject: LF: Ferrite characteristics > > > > Does anyone know of a method of measuring the characteristics > > (permeability) of ferrite cores? I have a box of these most without any > > identification although I do have T200, 68-2T and T68-2s whose > > characteristics are known. > > > > It occurs to me that you can make a tuned circuit and measure resonance > > with a GDO when a ferrite core is inserted into the inductance. A graph > > could be made of the different resonances with different cores, to > > extrapolate the unknowns. > > > > However I think that ferrite bulk might be a problem. For example I guess > > the red T cores use the same material but would there be a difference > > between the T200 and the T68? > > > > I have lots of material about ferrites in general - I just want to know > > what I have in my junk box. I am not interested in exact measurements, I > > just want to know if a core is suitable for a specific job. > > > > Regards > > > > Peter, G3LDO > > > > > >