Return-Path: Received: from rly-df12.mx.aol.com (rly-df12.mail.aol.com [172.19.156.25]) by air-df06.mail.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILINDF061-5994afad9f037f; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:36:25 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-df12.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDF128-5994afad9f037f; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:36:18 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1N8FEF-000374-U0 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:35:27 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1N8FEF-00036v-Di for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:35:27 +0000 Received: from smtp820.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([217.146.189.247]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1N8FDX-0006fE-DX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:34:44 +0000 Received: (qmail 46710 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2009 15:35:20 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=KCeemzDXrSPr0jtwPow/9ozET6DmDod+lXaPaIGTV3S2iwJ1+e0a/IRHkBfSp4Qh+3iTxRa6SzMM7yMasLEChOXVJKPJc83lC9fe+Pi9h8HRuVaNDR3ypASvPsnRGAoIOBBB4zVWe1+CtIteKSW8oWKIbJDoscuaMAcD4csFDfs= ; Received: from unknown (HELO DennisPC) (dennis.easterling@86.142.159.245 with login) by smtp820.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Nov 2009 15:35:19 -0000 X-Yahoo-SMTP: H_MJu2qswBDkdHeCAZfwexko6VNOiMP5URzYEvz3WrE5v1grQm6fnvJecjM9 X-YMail-OSG: 5uElZrIVM1nwYdQ6oro88ubOI.Dmt4LmTBJxHjnpbhGuJRLiyxvYJOsvLsl_sh1aD17RpcK2Sg2_KIOMUnbdE3RpT9hlbymf9lUBazEdyPTYQWMJuo4jko9j3N8SWR8ONg._akt1vUrtR4m_WS.GwzkYZZjBzmnMvkgEHWklm6jhvSzL2eMm697MXDPD8l4nLIyv14_77Rj8G_ICUbZEUKiVmJOB2Neb0M8kvuUVkwPeYwquh0z.T72u0E_rz0RFw60kIkjOVPCB8i0juplYFCwYqiUctM9SyzNK X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <0FBBF9B8F2964A18AC8D2E6AD58EFBF4@DennisPC> From: "DENNIS EASTERLING" To: References: <112811.74996.qm@web28501.mail.ukl.yahoo.com><001b01ca6225$fcddd970$0617aac0@jimdesk> <20091110192952.h8jck4a5wkwgg0s4@webmail6.kuleuven.be> In-Reply-To: <20091110192952.h8jck4a5wkwgg0s4@webmail6.kuleuven.be> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:35:15 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18005 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18005 X-Karma: unknown: DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Re: RE: Re: G3XIZ - 1000 th MF QSO Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Hi Rik I really did open a can of worms, least said now soonest mended hi. Thanks for the offer of crystals but I can manage ok. 73 Dennis M0JXM ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rik Strobbe" To: Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 6:29 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: RE: Re: G3XIZ - 1000 th MF QSO Hi Dennis, WSPR outside the 504.000 - 503.800 segment makes little sense, so a possible QSY can be only 100 Hz or so. But what xtal frequencies do you need to get away from the top end of the band? If you let me know I'll have a look in my xtal-box and if I find some you can use I will be happy to send them to you. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Quoting DENNIS EASTERLING : > Hi Jim > > I was speaking figuratively as you are so near and on my xtl frequency. > My comment was directed at Chris' statment in email subject1000 QSOs, > who also suffers and others who have complained about beacons in > general. In fact the band is often dead for hours on end and it is nice > to find any signal, beacon or QSO, especially when testing. My point is > that is there should be room for both beacons and QSOs, then follows a > suggestion that LFrs may like to come to some agreement about reserving > a section for each mode. > > Hoping I did not offend, 73 Dennis M0JXM > ----- Original Message ----- > From: James Cowburn > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 4:51 PM > Subject: LF: RE: Re: G3XIZ - 1000 th MF QSO > > Hi Dennis > > I did not realize I was causing you QRM. A quick e-mail would have > alerted me to it, rather than me being a “pain”. I’m happy to work out > a compromise where we operate at separate times or if you suggest a > different frequency for me to work on. Just drop me a line with your > ideas on this. > > With best regards > > > Jim > > > Dr. James Cowburn G7NKS > ________________________________ > From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of DENNIS > EASTERLING > Sent: 10 November 2009 16:13 > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: LF: Re: G3XIZ - 1000 th MF QSO > > Congratulations Chris. > > Most wspr stations seem to congregate at the top end of the band and are > not too much trouble. Jim G7NKS is the biggest pain as he sits on my > xtl frequency and is so close. Maybe a compromise would be for people > using beacons to keep to one segment of the band (hopefully not 502.2 > kHz -hee) > > 73 Dennis M0JXM > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Chris Osborn > To: LF Group > Sent: Sunday, November 08, 2009 6:03 PM > Subject: LF: G3XIZ - 1000 th MF QSO > > LF > > It was a red-letter day today as I achieved my 1000th QSO using 600m. > This includes 72 cross-band contacts, virtually all of which were 600m / > 80m. > > Rog GW3UEP was my 1000 th QSO with runners up G3XPU - No. 999 and > EI0CF - No. 998. > > QSO break-down according to mode: 928 CW, 34 RTTY and 5 QRSS > > 600m STATIONS > > My personal 600m (EU) spreadsheet lists a total of 59 stations and many > of these go back to the start of the UK 600m allocation in March 2007. > Of these I have worked or heard only 15 in the past month (excluding > beacons). > Many stations on my list came up only briefly and were never heard of > again: G3KZU, G3YHV . . . > Others were once very active but have subsequently gone QRT: G3UNT, > G3VTT, G4GDR. . . > > MOST FREQUENTLY WORKED > > With so few active operators it is obvious that one will work the same > stations many times and the top 10 stations account for 70% of my total > contacts. > My most frequently worked stations are: > > GW3UEP - 120 G3KEV - 102 M0FMT - 90 G3ZWH - 80 (alas now > SK) > G3DXZ - 67 G4GDR - 60 EI0CF/ GI4DPE - 51 M0JXM - 48 > G3UNT - 45 G3VTT - 38 > > CROSS-BAND AND EU STATIONS > > There are a few 'regular' stations who listen to 600m and enjoy a > cross-band QSO: > DK6NI, F6CNI, F6ACU, OH1LSQ, PA0LCE, G3TVF . . . > > and our few EU MF friends are still active: > ON4KTJ, OR7T and OZ8NJ. . . > > WSPR ON 600m > > I personally find it sad that the present level of enthusiasm for the > WSPR mode was never achieved for hand sent Morse (CW), which after all > is the mode which I call to mind when thinking of the old MF marine > band. > If the WSPR 'enthusiasm' phase lasts, with more and stronger stations > operating 24/7 in the narrow 3 kHz segment which is the 600m band then I > guess it may be time for me to QSY. > > 73 Chris G3XIZ > > > > > > > >