Return-Path: Received: from rly-dd08.mx.aol.com (rly-dd08.mail.aol.com [172.19.141.155]) by air-dd05.mail.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILINDD054-b914ae56558380; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 05:01:18 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-dd08.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDD083-b914ae56558380; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 05:01:15 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1N2LQp-0003Wy-B4 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:00:03 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1N2LQo-0003Wp-U3 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:00:02 +0000 Received: from cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([134.58.240.43]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1N2LQb-0006qt-15 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:59:51 +0000 Received: from smtps01.kuleuven.be (smtpshost01.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.74]) by cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C757B8047 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:59:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from PC_van_Rik.fys.kuleuven.be (dhcp-10-33-85-106.fys.kuleuven.be [10.33.85.106]) by smtps01.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53CA531E704 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:59:40 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:59:40 +0100 To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe In-Reply-To: <4AE4AEDC.5000404@btconnect.com> References: <4AE4AEDC.5000404@btconnect.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20091026085940.53CA531E704@smtps01.kuleuven.be> X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: WSPR Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Richard, there are discussions about the "true value" of some WSJT modes as they seem to use (or at least to have access to) a call database. But I though that WSPR does not use this database. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T At 21:02 25/10/2009, you wrote: >Has anyone else noticed how wspr seems to "guess" at callsigns and >locators? I have noticed that more dodgy decodes have the right format >than I would have expected by chance. > >73 > >Richard >G3CWI