Return-Path: Received: from rly-me04.mx.aol.com (rly-me04.mail.aol.com [172.20.83.38]) by air-me07.mail.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILINME072-9b44adf398f261; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:41:01 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-me04.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINME048-9b44adf398f261; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:40:48 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1N0eE9-0003np-QO for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:39:57 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1N0eE9-0003ng-9L for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:39:57 +0100 Received: from mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.47]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1N0eCX-0003nT-D6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:38:18 +0100 Received: from know-smtpout-1.server.virginmedia.net ([62.254.123.1]) by mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20091021163939.HMYR17029.mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@know-smtpout-1.server.virginmedia.net> for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:39:39 +0100 Received: from [82.12.254.228] (helo=jimdesk) by know-smtpout-1.server.virginmedia.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1N0eDr-0000wf-4s for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:39:39 +0100 From: "James Cowburn" To: References: <1442410468@web.de> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:39:26 +0100 Message-ID: <00bf01ca526d$0da572e0$0217aac0@jimdesk> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AcpSa0xi0fcw1Hj7QIiORd0dwkYuOgAAY4iQ In-Reply-To: <1442410468@web.de> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=F3M5lZpKAAAA:8 a=spfw7PUuAAAA:8 a=w-eWHFH8u3pyIg0vF4sA:9 a=ClbjEyrvzewb5ApLGEoqXPhT1zIA:4 a=VoFPz64Ki7sA:10 a=wk6s2zzMB60A:10 X-Karma: unknown: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: RE: Best receiving antenna wanted Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Hi Horst I've just installed one of Roelof Bakker's (PA0RDT) active mini whips= and it is excellent at my QTH. Just my view, others may have different exper= iences With best regards =20 =20 Jim =20 =20 Dr. James Cowburn G7NKS -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Horst St=F6ck= er Sent: 21 October 2009 17:26 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Best receiving antenna wanted Hello, now that I am happy with my selectiv level meter Praecitronic MV-62 I= am looking for the best receicing antenna. Especially I am interested in 400khz, 136kHz, 72kHz and below 22 kHz.= With my 40m longwire reception is not good enough and with a frame antenna= of 900m copper wire it was disappointing, too.. I think, an active antenna for 0 to 500 MHz would be the best for me= - but I am looking forward to any other idea. vy73 Horst DO1KHS _______________________________________________________________ Neu: WEB.DE DSL bis 50.000 kBit/s und 200,- Euro Startguthaben! http://produkte.web.de/go/02/