Return-Path: Received: from rly-dd05.mx.aol.com (rly-dd05.mail.aol.com [172.19.141.152]) by air-dd06.mail.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILINDD061-b7b4ab4bb6836a; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 07:07:31 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-dd05.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDD055-b7b4ab4bb6836a; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 07:07:21 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Moxm2-0002ab-BG for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 12:06:38 +0100 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Moxm1-0002aS-SJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 12:06:37 +0100 Received: from mail-bw0-f212.google.com ([209.85.218.212]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Moxls-0000Pq-PQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 12:06:30 +0100 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so1574299bwz.4 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 04:06:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=NyfrC2XCNUfziWotdzLvNuyswdzltVcZtprvundQ/bw=; b=vuAKpZwJvLqf7hUBp3h4nAkIVkUtJZY/qg5JWV9u1+/HCB6sTiqK9eoXKhGj6CIz0V SWOJpA4joMVOqodid5i5clrpUpdkkuB2z7ZuRUEsq1c22rHP62ERSGSzfIQHPuVktNuL og4NEo9VkUkqAA0ccEp1y5MOIHG2syLysavso= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Nd181nDtS0EpvJnkatQkeU6Wo4skrSyrRSpZRleU94FJo4jCLpDIQy9xTGyO7W+GXy T8AeJYEJBPHybG1JFD/btnGliksjJH8IPfaMTgosFesushg7qZbTd6M3+R54ENvp37T2 +WNeTSEL5uWtSIbRVwAGC/HQMVqPl8k+gNfTo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.142.145 with SMTP id g17mr228486hba.55.1253358382916; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 04:06:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 12:06:22 +0100 Message-ID: From: Andy Talbot To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_10_20=0.945,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: LF: 'JNT Dual purpose beacons Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f27fde30a6f60473ec3d18 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m233.1 ; domain : googlemail.com DKIM : fail X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --001485f27fde30a6f60473ec3d18 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I'm in the last stages of modifying my beacon to include a WSPR transmission that will run pseudo-simultaneously with the 15 minute regular one at 503.7kHz It has turned out to be posible to fit all the code into one controller PIC which simplifies the hardware considerably - the only downside is that the PSK31 message length has had to be shortened by a few characters to be able to get the additional WSPR symbol and frequency information into the EEPROM area of the PIC. I've included to option to be able to transmit the WSPR signal at a lower amplitude than the 15 minute beacon, and the pseudo random timing is anything but - it has been chosen to fit round the 15 minute intervals, and preferably not adjacent to them. Before I programme-up the actual beacon Tx, can I have some suggestion on the frequency that would be best to avoid existing users, and what sort of power to adopt, bearing in mind the main Tx runs at about 100 Watts of RF giving somewhere in the region of 24dBm ERP. Also some idea of a duty cycle to use - 50% is the maximum I've allowed for. Andy www.g4jnt.com this email has been scanned for political correctness by the nanny state --001485f27fde30a6f60473ec3d18 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm in the=A0last stages of modifying=A0my beacon=A0to include a= WSPR transmission that will run=A0pseudo-simultaneously=A0with the 15 min= ute regular one at 503.7kHz
=A0
It has turned out to=A0be posible to fit all the code into one contro= ller PIC which simplifies the hardware considerably - the only downside is= that the PSK31 message length has had to be shortened by a few characters= to be able to get the additional WSPR symbol and frequency information in= to the EEPROM area of the PIC.
=A0
I've included to option to be able to transmit the WSPR signal at= a lower amplitude than the 15 minute beacon, and the pseudo random timing= is anything but - it has=A0been chosen to fit round the 15 minute interva= ls, and preferably not=A0adjacent to them.=A0=A0
=A0
Before I programme-up the actual beacon Tx, can I have some suggestio= n on the frequency that would be best to avoid existing users, and what so= rt of power to adopt,=A0bearing in mind the main Tx=A0runs at=A0about 100= Watts of RF giving somewhere in the region of 24dBm ERP.=A0 Also=A0some= idea of a duty cycle to use - 50% is the maximum I've allowed for.

Andy
www.g4jnt.= com

this email has been scanned for political correctness by th= e nanny state
--001485f27fde30a6f60473ec3d18--