Return-Path: Received: from rly-df09.mx.aol.com (rly-df09.mail.aol.com [172.19.156.22]) by air-df08.mail.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILINDF082-57b4abc065b7b; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:53:10 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-df09.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDF098-57b4abc065b7b; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:53:00 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Mqy6S-0008Q5-Ve for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:52:00 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Mqy6S-0008Pw-If for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:52:00 +0100 Received: from smtp829.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([217.146.189.243]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Mqy5E-00008z-Oy for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:50:45 +0100 Received: (qmail 89872 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2009 23:51:44 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE; b=0zDl9xM72fFRceA/Cme9W3qaD/OUTmbN6XXjl1IUkgZyF6QefJNggUawATezSfq/OnFAF9F+d77VKOtt1bzpyp/o6rvbqUp0dp+ECz7tTsvZUBOVI7rxbijX7sPLGKGLqZtOdKsEhCDLc5IdN36D4aiLOEHWfdRycBTevQAaRCo= ; Received: from unknown (HELO JimPC) (james.moritz@86.178.46.216 with login) by smtp829.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Sep 2009 23:51:44 -0000 X-Yahoo-SMTP: qKIhhNCswBB2TTHr2BORWcGGR2mpopxhCcunGIxpCKQYiG07Q7UOhNo- X-YMail-OSG: 0Qvj8x0VM1kUimmkFvrUJu0d8w9oJdXtM3BXM8xhZ8thcXV3Ybtb8dVtua9Vio4bF62v9ctXqRtrYqTvpFaQtEx2zstdGU13ByHZtjyH46Dkx1f0fSCkfliO4LLOhYcEEuD20EMjWFZyqewYqX5.UZChFV_mNhPYvZW5Kp7j3EbuCv0t9pFnml7czkC9k_qhi7xNFk2xZgUGjl86Lz9WCQClXEg.sDE5kOWTCCzlQHAcoMM4EEV8PdsqAoTSiQtHKF.mIGK4hmjwwu513LU1udZmZq17PjwR2sK98SUMHIzsURsZUMXGSA-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <9772CAFC8C544C3BA88B1689B425E7C0@JimPC> From: "James Moritz" To: References: <250054929.177427.1253774595577.JavaMail.mail@webmail09>, , <8bf118410909240118p602e589x4caf743a7e24eda9@mail.gmail.com> <4ABB3058.9196.AE3C5E@dave.davesergeant.com> In-Reply-To: <4ABB3058.9196.AE3C5E@dave.davesergeant.com> Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:51:44 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049 X-Karma: unknown: DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: Re: Re: s/n shown by wspr .... what is it actually showing ? Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Dear Dave, LF Group, There seem to be some misunderstandings here... The little box with the receiver noise level is there so you can set the gain controls to a reasonable level where the incoming audio is well above the noise level of the sound card, but well below overload level. 0dB is what K1JT has settled on as an optimum level, but quite wide deviations from that (say +/- 10dB or more) will not have much effect on the decoding process, or the reported SNR of the signal. In fact, even if the overload level is reached on noise peaks, it still makes little difference provided it only occurs a reasonably small proportion of the time. The reported SNR is obtained by measuring the level of each WSPR signal during the 2 minute period, measuring the associated noise level during the same period, and calculating the dB ratio. Thus it is largely independent of the actual receiver or sound card gain settings, and gain can be varied through many dB (see above) without significantly changing the SNR reports. So there is no direct connection between the receiver output level and the SNR figures. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Sergeant" To: Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 9:39 AM Subject: LF: Re: s/n shown by wspr .... what is it actually showing ? > In the ideal case of course you have just receiver noise as your > background noise level. So you adjust your sound card input to give you > the magic 0dB on that. During the night the static crash level will > rise and push the S-meter to s9 at times. Every 15 minutes G4JNT will > do its one minute of transmission on 503.7 at various power levels and > push the little thing in the box well into the red. So one has to ask > oneself what exactly the dB figures in reports really mean....