References: <8CC0A51BEC060FC-3A6C-F94C@webmail-d041.sysops.aol.com> <42A58144357A4C1ABFA7F31B1148D87D@JimPC>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:18:42 -0400
In-Reply-To: <42A58144357A4C1ABFA7F31B1148D87D@JimPC>
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Markus Vester <markusvester@aol.com>
Message-Id: <8CC0AAA8FAFCDBF-1AD8-4A47@webmail-d069.sysops.aol.com>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: WSPR 137.0 kHz
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
 boundary="--------MB_8CC0AAA8FC79B7F_1AD8_974E_webmail-d069.sysops.aol.com"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


----------MB_8CC0AAA8FC79B7F_1AD8_974E_webmail-d069.sysops.aol.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"


Jim,



yes,=C2=A0my capture=C2=A0range=C2=A0should be 136.9 to 137.1 kHz.=C2=A0Bu=
t as you say, mediterranean QRN seems overwhelming now (look at=C2=A0www.b=
litzortung.org=C2=A0), so decodes may be erratic at best. Monday morning=
 in daylight, you were consistent at about -23 dB SNR (2.5 kHz).



Kind regards,

Markus


PS: to Andy and Graham, wouldn't 23 dB=C2=A0less than=C2=A02.5 kHz=C2=A0be=
 12.5 Hz, not 100 Hz?



-----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----=20
Von: James Moritz <james.moritz@btopenworld.com>
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Verschickt: Mi., 23. Sept. 2009, 22:52
Thema: LF: Re: WSPR 137.0 kHz



Dear Markus, Andrey, LF Group,=C2=A0
=C2=A0
I am now running the WSPR beacon again on 135.5kHz "dial frequency", 137.0=
90kHz RF out. Hopefully, this will be within range of Markus' receiver, an=
d also near enough to 137.1k for Andrey.=C2=A0
=C2=A0
If anyone else is going to be on 137k tonight, I can set the RX to monitor=
 their QRG - if not, I could put the RX on 500kHz again.=C2=A0
=C2=A0
Looking at Markus' grabber tonight, it is nearly a white-out (or rather gr=
een-out ;-)) due to the loud QRN, but we will see.=C2=A0
=C2=A0
Cheers, Jim Moritz=C2=A0
73 de M0BMU =C2=A0

----------MB_8CC0AAA8FC79B7F_1AD8_974E_webmail-d069.sysops.aol.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"


<div>Jim,</div>


<div>&nbsp;</div>


<div>yes,&nbsp;my capture&nbsp;range&nbsp;should be 136.9 to 137.1 kHz.&nb=
sp;But as you say, mediterranean QRN seems overwhelming now (look at&nbsp;=
<A href=3D"http://www.blitzortung.org">www.blitzortung.org</A>&nbsp;), so=
 decodes may be erratic at best. Monday morning in daylight, you were cons=
istent at about -23 dB SNR (2.5 kHz).</div>


<div>&nbsp;</div>


<div>Kind regards,</div>


<div>Markus</div>


<div><br>
PS: to Andy and Graham, wouldn't 23 dB&nbsp;less than&nbsp;2.5 kHz&nbsp;be=
 12.5 Hz, not 100 Hz?</div>


<div><br>
<br>
-----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung----- <br>
Von: James Moritz &lt;james.moritz@btopenworld.com&gt;<br>
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org<br>
Verschickt: Mi., 23. Sept. 2009, 22:52<br>
Thema: LF: Re: WSPR 137.0 kHz<br>
<br>
</div>


<div id=3DAOLMsgPart_0_76ced485-615c-4097-993f-8e33022d159b style=3D"FONT-=
SIZE: 12px; MARGIN: 0px; COLOR: #000; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial,=
 Sans-Serif; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #fff">Dear Markus, Andrey, LF Group,&nbsp;<=
br>
&nbsp;<br>
I am now running the WSPR beacon again on 135.5kHz "dial frequency", 137.0=
90kHz RF out. Hopefully, this will be within range of Markus' receiver, an=
d also near enough to 137.1k for Andrey.&nbsp;<br>
&nbsp;<br>
If anyone else is going to be on 137k tonight, I can set the RX to monitor=
 their QRG - if not, I could put the RX on 500kHz again.&nbsp;<br>
&nbsp;<br>
Looking at Markus' grabber tonight, it is nearly a white-out (or rather gr=
een-out ;-)) due to the loud QRN, but we will see.&nbsp;<br>
&nbsp;<br>
Cheers, Jim Moritz&nbsp;<br>
73 de M0B
MU &nbsp;<br>
</div>
<!-- end of AOLMsgPart_0_76ced485-615c-4097-993f-8e33022d159b -->

----------MB_8CC0AAA8FC79B7F_1AD8_974E_webmail-d069.sysops.aol.com--