Return-Path: Received: from rly-me07.mx.aol.com (rly-me07.mail.aol.com [172.20.83.41]) by air-me10.mail.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILINME103-9c74ab756c41f4; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:35:05 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-me07.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINME073-9c74ab756c41f4; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:34:46 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1MpgDV-0002Z3-1b for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:33:57 +0100 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1MpgDU-0002Yu-D1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:33:56 +0100 Received: from imr-ma01.mx.aol.com ([64.12.206.39]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MpgDL-0001bl-Gz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:33:48 +0100 Received: from imo-ma04.mx.aol.com (imo-ma04.mx.aol.com [64.12.78.139]) by imr-ma01.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n8LAXPqG024623 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:33:25 -0400 Received: from MarkusVester@aol.com by imo-ma04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.5.) id l.bda.4c2f5e77 (37180) for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:33:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtprly-dc03.mx.aol.com (smtprly-dc03.mx.aol.com [205.188.170.3]) by cia-ma05.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMA053-d3bc4ab7566e136; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:33:20 -0400 Received: from webmail-m092 (webmail-m092.sim.aol.com [64.12.102.42]) by smtprly-dc03.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYDC036-d3bc4ab7566e136; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:33:18 -0400 References: <4C6A9564799D4F7FA98DC30F8744135C@radiorummet> <8DF678EC671345C0A98CFC21311955E8@JimPC> <75819806.1253472343.161309184.83998@mcgi43.rambler.ru> <01b801ca3a40$f826a2c0$0201a8c0@Clemens04> <4A395A802C5242128306AE2A1698AA02@JimPC> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:33:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4A395A802C5242128306AE2A1698AA02@JimPC> X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Markus Vester X-MB-Message-Type: User X-Mailer: Webmail 28198-STANDARD Received: from 194.138.39.60 by webmail-m092.sysops.aol.com (64.12.102.42) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:33:17 -0400 Message-Id: <8CC08BE10EDA2F3-2EDC-10172@webmail-m092.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: MarkusVester@aol.com X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: Re: WSPR 137.0k Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CC08BE11481733_2EDC_20FE3_webmail-m092.sysops.aol.com" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 ----------MB_8CC08BE11481733_2EDC_20FE3_webmail-m092.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi Jim, LF, your WSPR on 137.0 kHz was received fairly well in Nuernberg throughout th= e night. Often the SNR in the QRN appeared marginal even though the trace= on the grabber screen looked quite good - this is due WSPR fed by linear= audio containing all the impulsive noise, whereas the SpecLab screen did= have the software noise blanker engaged. The frequency incidentally suits me well as my grabber receiver is sitting= on 135.5 kHz USB anyway, eliminating the need of another frequency conver= sion and a second PC running WSPR. I'll just leave it like that for a coup= le of days, so any possible spots between 136.9 and 137.1 will hopefully= be uploaded. Best 73, Markus, DF6NM =C2=A0=20 -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----=20 Von: James Moritz An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Verschickt: Mo., 21. Sept. 2009, 9:04 Thema: Re: LF: Re: WSPR 137.0k Dear LF Group,=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Thanks to all for the overnight reports/decodes. I also set my RX to liste= n for WD2XES on 137.577k, but no decodes here - perhaps not suprising cons= idering the level of QRN!=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Cheers, Jim Moritz=C2=A0 73 de M0BMU=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 ----------MB_8CC08BE11481733_2EDC_20FE3_webmail-m092.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Hi Jim, LF,
 
your WSPR on 137.0 kHz was received fairly well in Nuernberg througho= ut the night. Often the SNR in the QRN appeared marginal even though the= trace on the grabber screen looked quite good - this is due WSPR fed by= linear audio containing all the impulsive noise, whereas the SpecLab scre= en did have the software noise blanker engaged.
 
The frequency incidentally suits me well as my grabber receiver is si= tting on 135.5 kHz USB anyway, eliminating the need of another frequency= conversion and a second PC running WSPR. I'll just leave it like that for= a couple of days, so any possible spots between 136.9 and 137.1 will hope= fully be uploaded.
 
Best 73,
Markus, DF6NM
 


-----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: James Moritz <james.moritz@btopenworld.com>
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Verschickt: Mo., 21. Sept. 2009, 9:04
Thema: Re: LF: Re: WSPR 137.0k

Dear LF Group, 
 
Thanks to all for the overnight reports/decodes. I also set my RX to liste= n for WD2XES on 137.577k, but no decodes here - perhaps not suprising cons= idering the level of QRN! 
 
Cheers, Jim Moritz 
73 de M0BMU 
 
 
----------MB_8CC08BE11481733_2EDC_20FE3_webmail-m092.sysops.aol.com--