Return-Path: Received: from rly-mc03.mx.aol.com (rly-mc03.mail.aol.com [172.21.164.87]) by air-mc05.mail.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILINMC052-d644ab7c93e24; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:43:24 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-mc03.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMC034-d644ab7c93e24; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:43:11 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1MpnqG-0007MZ-S2 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:42:28 +0100 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1MpnqG-0007MP-86 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:42:28 +0100 Received: from mail-yw0-f203.google.com ([209.85.211.203]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Mpnq6-00066H-Bv for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:42:20 +0100 Received: by ywh41 with SMTP id 41so4223874ywh.1 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:42:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=E5PhY4+WNLLwmqK/G8Rj2euXocqihkTA3uJ4uwkfqq8=; b=N3SQg8aJOlxyI5Cb4XgTvaePGRGytPw6CGc9w3640kttanJ9P45ouyRk+0u4uhpbU9 jTsIAT9WNM1MLqH73OKpEvPpFla4Wmword1rOQp+tRSGV/06I67XnBUQ076+ed9DUOdL OXVLGEfbTyezK1fDARHDVbNqQZRj22erkidMc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=mVHcimR8R7pQ7ha79D4a7EMNvH3AZze7bchPXnabMQj2KcGoqwEbpl8uACQzEO12UX rktodpiWtHKhNhO1FI7f8xpTIbXJgIEnURWYVaBx4oPl2ASOvb0ZFLFSTgKsxdt+TIpt 5oAddrf+DhhpQtkLCKGJm7NPPudcDWJpckfLU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.92.3 with SMTP id u3mr90805ybl.145.1253558532044; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:42:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <000401ca3ac1$18dd35d0$0900a8c0@lark> References: <47C531A902A946C9BE2EEC5C6B7E2EF3@presario1> <000401ca3ac1$18dd35d0$0900a8c0@lark> Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:42:12 -0400 Message-ID: <57a24ca70909211142p69c851aag8948b72f04ae28e0@mail.gmail.com> From: Warren Ziegler To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: US 500-kHz band plan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m217.2 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Jim, Alan, Fritz does NOT represent all of the US 500kHz activity and his band plan is not being followed here by non-XSH stations so I would take all this with a large grain of salt. Keep in mind that in addition to WD2XSH there is WE2XPQ, WD2XFX, and WE2XTT, and a half dozen WE2XGR stations as well as other pending applications. --=20 73 Warren K2ORS WD2XGJ WD2XSH/23 WE2XEB/2 WE2XGR/1 On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Alan Melia wr= ote: > Hi Jim. whist it involves a change in "usage" from our end it would not= seem > unreasonable to ensure that the US stations have a chance of hearing us > without nearby swamping. I think this is an interesting development beca= suse > it now seems that Frtiz is extending the experiment to intercontinental > tests/qsos.......an activity he discouraged earlier....due to the terms= of > the original application and grant I believe. I have to admit my opinion= s > carry very little weight as a "non-active operator" :-)) But maybe it wi= ll > stimulate others with differing opinions to voice them to you. > > Best wishes > Alan G3NYK > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "James Moritz" > To: > Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 2:14 PM > Subject: LF: Re: US 500-kHz band plan > > >> Dear LF Group, >> >> I still haven't replied to Fritz Raab, W1FR, regarding the WD2XSH US ba= nd >> plan which he is apparently coordinating - you may remember I posted th= e > US >> proposals, which he sent me, a couple of weeks ago, but have not receiv= ed >> any comments from other UK/Eu stations. I think I should reply with >> something, so now is your chance... The proposal relates to the US >> allocation extending to 495 - 515kHz, and how that would fit in with > current >> UK and Eu beacon operations. The content of the e-mail is below. The is= sue >> is that they would like to make a 501.0 - 501.2kHz WSPR sub-band, to fi= t > in >> with the various other proposals. Various other types of beacon modes= are >> allocated frequencies outside the UK/EI/ON 501 - 504kHz range, while > 501.2 - >> 504kHz is allocated to "general comms". Retaining frequencies just belo= w >> 504kHz would divide their "general comms" band in two >> >> I don't think there is anything preventing us from doing this, it is ju= st >> the inconvenience of turning the current band "upside-down". Let me kno= w >> what you think! >> >> Cheers, Jim Moritz >> 73 de M0BMU >> >> >>>From W1FR: >> >> Greetings: >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0Thanks for the comments on the band plan, passed >> along to me by W1XP. >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0About a month ago, a modification to the WD2XSH >> license was approved that adds stations and gives us >> access to 495 - 510 kHz. =A0Perhaps half of the 42 stations >> will eventually get on the air. =A0Because of NDBs, some >> stations are limited to parts of this band and we will >> have two calling frequencies and two beacon bands. >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0A draft of our new band plan follows. =A0Of particular >> interest is WSPR. =A0As I see it, our options are: >> >> (a) =A0501.0-501.2: =A0Conveniently on one side of our comms >> =A0 =A0 =A0band. =A0Will not overload WSPR receivers near 504 kHz. >> =A0 =A0 =A0Apparently in EU CW-beacon band. >> >> (b) =A0503.8-504.0: =A0Apparently same as what you guys are >> =A0 =A0 =A0using. =A0Cuts our comms band in the middle. =A0Nearby >> =A0 =A0 =A0stations may overload US receivers trying to hear EUs. >> >> (c) =A0503.9-504.1: =A0Same problems as above with cutting >> =A0 =A0 =A0comms band in two and overloading. =A0Conveniently >> =A0 =A0 =A0straddles both G/ON/EI and Canadian bands. >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0Any further thoughts you may have will be >> appreciated. >> >> >> 73, Fritz, W1FR >> >> Frederick H. (Fritz) Raab, Ph.D. >> GREEN MOUNTAIN RADIO RESEARCH COMPANY >> 77 Vermont Avenue, Fort Ethan Allen >> Colchester, Vermont 05446 =A0USA >> Tel./Fax.: =A0+1 (802) 655-9670 =A0Home: =A0+1 (802) 862-0997 >> E-mail: =A0f.raab@ieee.org >> >> BASIC BAND PLAN for WD2XSH >> >> f, kHz =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0USE >> >> 495.0 - 495.1 =A0 QRSS, 1-Hz spacing, 40 stations >> 495.1 - 495.6 =A0 CW/PSK beacons midwest, 100-Hz spacing, 10 stations >> 495.6 - 499.0 =A0 Comms >> 497.5 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Calling frequency >> 499.0 - 501.0 =A0 Reserved for heritage stations and special events >> 501.0 - 501.2 =A0 WSPR >> 501.2 - 505.0 =A0 Comms >> 505.0 - 505.2 =A0 DX window >> 505.2 - 508.5 =A0 Comms >> 507.5 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Calling frequency >> 508.5 - 510.0 =A0 CW/PSK beacons east, south, west, Pacific, 50-Hz spac= ing, > 30 >> stations >> 510.0 - 511.0 =A0 WE2XGR beacons >> 511.0 - 515.0 =A0 WE2XGR SSB and wideband modes >> >> >> OTHER IN-BAND SIGNALS >> >> 503.976 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 NEED LSB >> 505.0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 NEED carrier >> 506.024 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 NEED USB >> >> 508.976 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 OF/FA LSB >> 510.0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 OF/FA carrier >> 511.024 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 OF/FA USB >> >> > > >