Return-Path: Received: from rly-mg07.mx.aol.com (rly-mg07.mail.aol.com [172.20.83.113]) by air-mg01.mail.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILINMG013-a224abb153185; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 02:44:21 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-mg07.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMG074-a224abb153185; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 02:44:03 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Mqi35-0002vp-Vf for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:43:27 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Mqi35-0002vg-K2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:43:27 +0100 Received: from smtprelay0093.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.93] helo=smtprelay.hostedemail.com) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Mqi1s-00065R-Ct for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:42:13 +0100 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (ff-bigip1 [10.5.19.254]) by smtprelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DC87887E950 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:43:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Session-Marker: 70657465722E636C65616C6C4076697267696E2E6E6574 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2244 Received: from webmail09 (imap-ext [216.40.42.5]) (Authenticated sender: peter.cleall@virgin.net) by omf04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:43:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 86.177.204.162 ([86.177.204.162]) by webmail09 (Tucows Webmail) with HTTP; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:43:15 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:43:15 +0000 (GMT) From: Peter Cleall To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <250054929.177427.1253774595577.JavaMail.mail@webmail09> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [86.177.204.162] X-Karma: unknown: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: Re: LF: s/n shown by wspr .... what is it actually showing ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) a more fundamental question. at the bottom of the WSPR screen a red box has Rx Noise then a -dB number. What order of dBs do you normally see in here. regards peter Sep 23, 2009 11:57:43 PM, rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org wrote: =========================================== Dear Graham, LF Group, The SNR you see with Spectrum Lab will depend also on the relation between the spectrogram bandwidth (depending mostly on the resolution of the Fast Fourier Transform process) and the spectrum of the signal being monitored. Usually, the signal has a larger bandwidth than the FFT "bin", so varying amounts of signal appear in different bins. So the SNR measured from the spectrum graph is only useful as a relative measure between signals of the same type, without further analysis to total up the signal power in different bins. To get the SNR for a particular mode from the WSPR SNR data for 2500Hz BW, you need to take the different bandwidths into account: mode SNR(dB) = WSPR SNR - 10log(mode bandwidth / 2500Hz) So if WSPR was giving SNR of -10dB, the SNR for PSK31 with 62Hz bandwidth would be +6.1dB. What SNR is actually needed for successful copy depends on the type of modulation, the effectiveness of error correction, how good the demodulator is, what the nature of the noise is, etc. I suppose for most modes it is between about 0 and +several dB Cheers, Jim moritz 73 de M0BMU