Message-ID: <20090829111220.4lgs3rdgb4ccgw04@webmail6.kuleuven.be>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 11:12:20 +0200
From: Rik Strobbe <Rik.Strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be>
To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <9afca2640908261406r3ced27fr31bbca942848a291@mail.gmail.com>
	<005701ca2707$438a4570$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920>
	<9afca2640908270502q3136dd1cjf52d2666eedeed94@mail.gmail.com>
	<009c01ca2731$2d5e0e60$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920>
	<9afca2640908271133v7eea7f18r7855a822514399a4@mail.gmail.com>
	<847F3A04E31C413A81AD022BDC11AD46@JimPC>
	<007e01ca2801$85412d80$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920>
In-Reply-To: <007e01ca2801$85412d80$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.2)
Subject: Re: LF: Re: 137kHz WSPR - what frequency?
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=ISO-8859-1;
	DelSp="Yes";
	format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


> For someone that has not progressed beyond basic entry level CW you
> are not in a position to compare the merits of CW v other non morse mode=
s.

I guess that counts a an personal attack.
I haven't noticed anything wrong with Jim's CW, but that's probably =20
because I am a lousy CW operator too ;-)

Rik, ON7YD


Quoting mal hamilton <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>:

> Jim
> It is a pity you cannot stick to the subject, instead you launch a perso=
nal
> attack. For someone that has not progressed beyond basic entry level CW=
 you
> are not in a position to compare the merits of CW v other non morse mode=
s.
> Who are 'us guys'
> An apology would not go amiss.
> mal/g3kev
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "James Moritz" <james.moritz@btopenworld.com>
> To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 9:18 PM
> Subject: Re: LF: Re: 137kHz WSPR - what frequency?
>
>
>> Dear Roger, LF Group,
>>
>> Please bear in mind that G3KEV does not speak for "us guys", only himse=
lf.
>> Over the years we have learned to ignore him most of the time - if we=
 took
>> much notice, we would all have given up a long time ago.
>>
>> If you look in the WSPR on-line database specifying the band as "LF/VLF=
",
>> you will see that there has been quite a lot of WSPR activity over the
>> last
>> year on 136k and 500k, which has been one of the more successful digita=
l
>> modes in this part of the spectrum. The points you make regarding narro=
w
>> bandwidth and low power are certainly useful at LF/MF. The summer month=
s
>> are
>> usually rather lacking in activity due to the short nights and high QRN=
,
>> but
>> activity, no doubt including WSPR, will be picking up soon as we get in=
to
>> autumn.
>>
>> The M0BMU LF/MF station is currently QRT due to a recent visit from
>> relatives - all those pretty coloured wires and 3-year-olds don't reall=
y
>> mix! It will probably be put back together this weekend though, so if=
 you
>> are interested in trying WSPR on 136k or 500k, let me know.
>>
>> Cheers, Jim Moritz
>> 73 de M0BMU
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Roger Lapthorn" <rogerlapthorn@gmail.com>
>> To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 7:33 PM
>> Subject: Re: LF: Re: 137kHz WSPR - what frequency?
>>
>>
>> ...But it's *not* my place to tell you guys how to use the LF bands so
>> with
>>> this, I'll leave you to it and get back on 10m WSPR, CW and SSB.  Good
>>> luck
>>> with whatever modes you enjoy.
>>>
>>> Roger
>>> 73s
>>> G3XBM
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------=
--------
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.69/2328 - Release Date: 08/26/=
09
> 12:16:00
>
>
>