Return-Path: Received: from rly-dd08.mx.aol.com (rly-dd08.mail.aol.com [172.19.141.155]) by air-dd08.mail.aol.com (v124.15) with ESMTP id MAILINDD084-b924a9676cd25b; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 08:06:43 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-dd08.mx.aol.com (v124.15) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDD084-b924a9676cd25b; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 08:06:39 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Mgdjq-0007eK-9K for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:05:58 +0100 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Mgdjp-0007e4-Dg for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:05:57 +0100 Received: from smtp.qtxt.dns-iol.com ([195.200.78.13]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Mgdji-000462-DD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:05:52 +0100 Received: (qmail 32732 invoked by uid 507); 27 Aug 2009 14:05:24 +0200 Received: from unknown (HELO JR) (john.rabson@numeo.fr@217.67.155.178) by smtp.qtxt.dns-iol.com with SMTP; 27 Aug 2009 14:05:24 +0200 Message-ID: <200908271405090697.1E1B1156@smtp2.numeo.fr> In-Reply-To: <005701ca2707$438a4570$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> References: <9afca2640908261406r3ced27fr31bbca942848a291@mail.gmail.com> <005701ca2707$438a4570$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> X-Mailer: Courier 3.50.00.09.1098 (http://www.rosecitysoftware.com) (P) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:05:09 +0200 From: "John RABSON" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Re: 137kHz WSPR - what frequency? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Why is WSPR (6Hz BW) supposedly unacceptable, yet 12wpm CW (about 50Hz BW)= is OK? John F5VLF *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 27/08/2009 at 12:12 mal hamilton wrote: >Roger >The majority of operators over the years prefer CW on LF and MF. These >bands are narrow and we do not want the few Khz available cluttered up >with data modes, especially Beacons.=20 >Those countries with several Khz allocated like the USA have sufficient >space to provide slots for all modes, different story.=20 >I am on LF and MF daily using normal CW if you would like a QSO.=20 >73 De mal/g3kev > > > ----- Original Message -----=20 > From: Roger Lapthorn=20 > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 > Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 10:06 PM > Subject: LF: 137kHz WSPR - what frequency? > > > What is the dial setting frequency (USB) for 137kHz WSPR and are there >any particular date/times when WSPR is being used? I'd like to listen. > > 73s > Roger > G3XBM > > --=20 > ------------------------------------------------------------- > http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ > http://www.g3xbm.co.uk > G3XBM GQRP 1678 ISWL G11088 > > > >-------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com=20 > Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.69/2328 - Release Date: >08/26/09 12:16:00