Return-Path: Received: from rly-db10.mx.aol.com (rly-db10.mail.aol.com [172.19.130.85]) by air-db05.mail.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILINDB053-aef4a9a85983ab; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 09:59:03 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-db10.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDB105-aef4a9a85983ab; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 09:58:49 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Mhkur-0007CZ-5K for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:57:57 +0100 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Mhkuq-0007CQ-Ky for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:57:56 +0100 Received: from smtp825.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([217.146.188.235]) by relay3.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Mhkuj-0006e1-7i for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:57:51 +0100 Received: (qmail 74826 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2009 13:57:43 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=eoQYO3IcdQYOPsidFAQazDACWaTAHTdbpKlG0MlyknBS9qyMKstWRGpnWHSynMqnVhs8N4lAzDWosEbUw+jLrj4qF/kxiw/fgvJFRVDU5aKHwDNM8xp/VTAhitHIrrLZKmoPhiTOojDRF9QPxEKBOoHmWc3C2K12dP69rzwSPcg= ; Received: from unknown (HELO JimPC) (james.moritz@86.177.108.28 with login) by smtp825.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Aug 2009 13:57:43 -0000 X-Yahoo-SMTP: qKIhhNCswBB2TTHr2BORWcGGR2mpopxhCcunGIxpCKQYiG07Q7UOhNo- X-YMail-OSG: IrcHBdYVM1mxpePeY5F1jYW2Qnpzxa4gSChXyuWxXa9lVsNqXuct2k4oGwUg.0MLgY8pXcA8kAsO2emLg3Oz9MJIeoM1oW35YOtxT5qxaeU_qsL6hiq62_sDinXeqnWcv6dl4JLXGy1Qw2EWaHWVpJzzlD0DDGL1cA7Od.anb6IC22VySPaz44gH6dW8lpyAy.XzHlrR.mi8HHFjxwxc_CyC7kZMsPUYnEmQtTQHbRy5tswD3CU- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <171181B694684DD8A9131D31D307EB5B@JimPC> From: "James Moritz" To: References: <211F6B38DA2544AD84B814000D47EDF6@AGB> <0F69884C983F4F198A9B4B4F276326AD@radiorummet> In-Reply-To: <0F69884C983F4F198A9B4B4F276326AD@radiorummet> Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:57:43 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: Re: WSPR frequencies on 500k band Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Dear Graham, Gus, LF Group, Since SM6BHZ can use 503.8 - 504.0kHz, and also Rik ON7YD and other ON stations (not sure about this mode, though), it would seem to make sense to use this as the default European WSPR frequency range. I think the other Eu beacon stations are restricted to using spot frequencies. I also have received some enquiries from Fritz Raab, W1FR, who is coordinating the US 500k band plan for their recently extended band, regarding having a common agreed WSPR beacon segment, which would certainly make good sense. The proposed US band plan looks like this: 495.0 - 495.1 QRSS, 1-Hz spacing, 40 stations 495.1 - 495.6 CW/PSK beacons midwest, 100-Hz spacing, 10 stations 495.6 - 499.0 Comms 497.5 Calling frequency 499.0 - 501.0 Reserved for heritage stations and special events 501.0 - 501.2 WSPR 501.2 - 505.0 Comms 505.0 - 505.2 DX window 505.2 - 508.5 Comms 507.5 Calling frequency 508.5 - 510.0 CW/PSK beacons east, south, west, Pacific, 50-Hz spacing, 30 stations 510.0 - 511.0 WE2XGR beacons 511.0 - 515.0 WE2XGR SSB and wideband modes Quoting from W1FR's email: "... (a) 501.0-501.2: Conveniently on one side of our comms band. Will not overload WSPR receivers near 504 kHz. Apparently in EU CW-beacon band. (b) 503.8-504.0: Apparently same as what you guys are using. Cuts our comms band in the middle. Nearby stations may overload US receivers trying to hear EUs. (c) 503.9-504.1: Same problems as above with cutting comms band in two and overloading. Conveniently straddles both G/ON/EI and Canadian bands. ..." Although it is possible to operate WSPR with split TX/RX frequencies, this has the drawback that, without 2 receivers, you can only receive stations from one side of the pond during one session. This is a drawback for receiving stations outside western Europe and the US, and for gathering propagation data from WSPR. There is some argument that it could be difficult to receive DX signals in the presence of strong local beacons in the same frequency range, but I think this is less of a problem on 500k WSPR due to the relatively weak ground-wave signals and the randomised time slots, compared to the experience with 136kHz QRSS beacons. I suppose the main reason for sticking with 503.8 - 504.0kHz is that it has become the default for UK stations, and that the band below 503.0kHz has been mostly used for CW. On the other hand, a significant number of stations experience QRM near to 504.0kHz, attributed to the 2nd harmonic of Atlantic 252, although that may not be the only source. So a beacon segment near the lower band edge in line with the US intention could actually give better results. What do other people think?... Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU >... Graham, for me there is no problem to tramsmit under 504 kHz. Why not run WSPR beacon from 503.900- 504.000 kHz !? de Gus SM6BHZ