Return-Path: Received: from rly-md08.mx.aol.com (rly-md08.mail.aol.com [172.20.29.146]) by air-md06.mail.aol.com (v124.15) with ESMTP id MAILINMD062-91f4a5100081ad; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 15:33:46 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-md08.mx.aol.com (v124.15) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMD087-91f4a5100081ad; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 15:33:31 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1MNXRl-0006BT-5r for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 20:32:21 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1MNXRk-0006BK-LH for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 20:32:20 +0100 Received: from smtp127.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.85.14]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MNXRi-00060k-Ke for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 20:32:18 +0100 Received: (qmail 75109 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2009 19:32:12 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE; b=WuUoD4v1QDLP9xp3pwSplCyK3vAOnI39l6u4Xxqp4zzkiDgUTuJNDU91Fm0sgSUh4tjb6hTzSmgf3OCVhggLQrNMt6MYW404xSpL92CyRp3ZwmB1CxnwgB/41aOqNMjpsCOMT7WquwBzHSGFko2VaJ6f6IqrgYUTWghPgQtPB58= ; Received: from unknown (HELO lindavideo) (ken.h.wright@86.133.87.94 with login) by smtp127.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Jul 2009 19:32:12 -0000 X-Yahoo-SMTP: APVNTmmswBB1ajQe0.MR1eIpHqOdoGKpEnK7HtPhl2t5AIcci3nTdw-- X-YMail-OSG: G2p3cLQVM1miwaISJNkO6_jz6c1Hnh_2GRKegbO4Yl_Eh6_9LyRVFWcIodBbP5xiPAwhdFQJZZFjmT9aWqgxwAOWzVK6xcRJA_GPfNGp0WDi6bkoq.8gOnJXiFxNtf52QDBs.BFjt3VILGl69JP7FQslT.phT71lUtLcRbniG85IMzjvSK6rYQjfW1uKw7PmTy3tuvlD60d0VsjWPiL7O5njgKz1EtdgCbNGvk8b16tXSlFcwD7xm58d_GYPdpKC1gIIHj1Wm2Z58d34L_fMJKexykoWqW_28JpuVhdJ.bh9B.izDmspDSP5ujxdviwG0tLgD3D2ro4Fr_UuQ6lW9tv_dGL4pIGIu9kI04FD6.h.INdwzg-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <619D59A9B6FC4D4ABDD81D32FBB2A180@lindavideo> From: "Ken" To: Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 20:32:03 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) Subject: LF: Fw: [SEML] Unusually Deep Solar Minimum (aka A Tale of Two Suns) Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-7"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Hi everyone, I thought this may be of interest, it came from one of my Total Solar Eclipse sites. 73 Ken M0KHW ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anthony Ayiomamitis" To: "Solar Eclipse Mailing List" Cc: "Jay Pasachoff" Sent: Sunday, July 05, 2009 3:09 PM Subject: [SEML] Unusually Deep Solar Minimum (aka A Tale of Two Suns) > Dear group, > > Who stole the sunspots?! Where have they gone?! > > As noted by Dr Phillips (SpaceWeather), "As of March 31st, there were no > sunspots on 78 of the year's 90 days (87%)." (see > http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/01apr_deepsolarminimum.htm?list5796 ) > and this a continuation of 2008 where 266 days were characterized without > any sunspot activity (same reference). > > For an interesting collage of two images spaced precisely four years apart > and which is a perfect representation of what is happening (actually NOT > happening) with Sol at this moment, I kindly direct you to > http://www.perseus.gr/Astro-Solar-Scenes-Deep-Minimum-2005-2009.htm . More > specifically, one of the two component images in the collage is from July > 5th, 2005 and which documents the sample rich activity which is > characteristic of the sun during non-minimum periods. The second component > image in the collage is from July 5th, 2009 and is most characteristic of > the blank sun which has become the norm and status quo. Please remember to > click on the hyperlinked image which really brings the message forth in a > higher analysis rendition of the same result. > > Some research suggests this lack of sunspot activity impacts the levels of > UV in our atmosphere and which in turn impact the development of clouds. > Certainly winters have been unusually severe and it seems each and every > winter manages to find a way to be worse than the previous one. > > Let's hope for at least sunspot grouping on July 22nd so that we can focus > our prized toys directed at the sun ... along with good weather and great > transparency! > > Anthony. > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SEML/ > > <*> Your email settings: > Individual Email | Traditional > > <*> To change settings online go to: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SEML/join > (Yahoo! ID required) > > <*> To change settings via email: > mailto:SEML-digest@yahoogroups.com > mailto:SEML-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com > > <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > SEML-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ >