Return-Path: Received: from rly-mf05.mx.aol.com (rly-mf05.mail.aol.com [172.20.29.175]) by air-mf10.mail.aol.com (v124.15) with ESMTP id MAILINMF103-9614a64c56e15c; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:29:01 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-mf05.mx.aol.com (v124.15) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMF057-9614a64c56e15c; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:28:47 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1MSyWc-0005UE-H0 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:27:50 +0100 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1MSyWc-0005U5-3d for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:27:50 +0100 Received: from mail-gx0-f221.google.com ([209.85.217.221]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MSyWY-0004IJ-2m for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:27:48 +0100 Received: by gxk21 with SMTP id 21so4006073gxk.4 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:27:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=w6frPgNPW8PUm4kvLE0by5jfX+BE/J9AQ1tOLgX3TYA=; b=VSPuej1Kt4IgLcbrj73vBXEQqMQJfmCDWCOtOs03sJ7Q9dqsVh8GMeG5famjQ8LnMC MlW03PkV8Q4ngmKzdYp/MhWTAHhiVFIdJdkpMDuuFoZ301auQCDJYrQ+7PvQQS+vTQvK ugsTBOouEc9dFj105kc4RCMLI22bx2b7jv3FQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=q1WTOLNeQfbf6ioOd8HSVgGxQZKJ8PyZDf7YDfNT0ovdOL/ZIXxl8J7msPrMq/jWxx h7ZR/dS7NmuqWNyCqzw+rFnxOdfD88U3n/zG7el6K2HTnSdoyne/gJrcOU+q7tSxxSk8 rVxmKHG+vDQ/b8fbwBWY0UJ3ByfayNzbwrUvs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.226.14 with SMTP id y14mr6304194ybg.3.1248118060013; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:27:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <12821.82.161.81.65.1248110576.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> References: <12821.82.161.81.65.1248110576.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:27:39 -0400 Message-ID: <57a24ca70907201227t5333113bj2ffd4b82c1d1d783@mail.gmail.com> From: Warren Ziegler To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: IC7200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m266.2 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) According to QST: "Reduced receiver sensitivity below 500kHz ... *Preamp off/on: 505 kHz, =96121/=96128 dBm; 137 kHz, =96116/=9695 dBm; 30= kHz, =9677/=9666 dBm. The preamp does not improve sensitivity below approximately 250 kHz." --=20 73 Warren K2ORS WD2XGJ WD2XSH/23 WE2XEB/2 WE2XGR/1 On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Roelof Bakker wrote: > Hello all, > > I am looking for information on the LF receiver performance of the new > ICOM IC7200 transceiver. There seems to be a review in the June issue of > QST. > I don't have direct access to QST. Is there someone who has access to QS= T > and can tell me if anything has been said about receiver sensitivity bel= ow > 500 kHz? > > Even better is there someone on this list with first hands experience? > > Thank you in advance. > > Roelof Bakker, pa0rdt