Return-Path: Received: from rly-mf01.mx.aol.com (rly-mf01.mail.aol.com [172.20.29.171]) by air-mf03.mail.aol.com (v124.15) with ESMTP id MAILINMF034-93f4a68f4f9316; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:41:10 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-mf01.mx.aol.com (v124.15) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMF015-93f4a68f4f9316; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:40:43 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1MU7t1-0006Ke-O1 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:39:43 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1MU7t1-0006KV-3k for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:39:43 +0100 Received: from [193.252.22.190] (helo=smtp6.freeserve.com) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MU7si-00074F-BP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:39:24 +0100 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3604.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 9A7007000084 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:39:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from AGB (unknown [91.109.11.228]) by mwinf3604.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with SMTP id 5C9697000082 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:39:32 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20090723233932379.5C9697000082@mwinf3604.me.freeserve.com Message-ID: <49FC75F6A7D2439197581F10016D72AE@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <1MTixd-0cGXyK0@fwd00.t-online.de> <4A687388.4050801@usa.net> <1MU4lz-1dRfeq0@fwd10.t-online.de> <434E6E4F7AC64D8B995F684D832555DA@JimPC> In-Reply-To: <434E6E4F7AC64D8B995F684D832555DA@JimPC> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:39:31 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8064.206 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8064.206 X-Karma: unknown: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Loop discussion Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Hi Jim, One disadvantage of a big loop is the (dc) voltage it collects, the 600 ft delta at gb4fpr has a habit of producing quite big arcs' if its not earthed ... and not just a small one at that!!. even on a fine sunny day ..it may be simply wind-age or perhaps ozone from the sea, may also account for the very high noise level as well ..? Being surrounded by salt water seems to be a case of 'all that glitters in not gold' 73 - G .. Ps - Interesting topic .. may solve the 'problem' -------------------------------------------------- From: "James Moritz" Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 12:23 AM To: Subject: Re: LF: Loop discussion > > Dear Ha-Jo, LF Group, > > The beauty of a large wire loop of several m^2 is that a high signal level > is produced, making tuning and matching non-critical, and so it is a very > simple and versatile antenna which works well over a wide frequency range. > My version of an outdoor wire loop tunable in the shack was the "Lazy > loop" - see http://www.wireless.org.uk/lazy.htm > > When you are trying to make a much smaller loop with essentially the same > performance, design is more critical due to the lower signal power > available > from the loop, so the technical details need to be studied, and the > solution > has to be more closely defined. But the end result is still simple - a > single turn loop, a transformer, a preamp. In the case of the bandpass > loops, a few inductors and capacitors do impedance matching and define the > passband. It is worth going to this trouble, because a compact, portable, > easily rotated loop that does the same job as a much bigger antenna is a > useful thing to have. > > Cheers, Jim Moritz > 73 de M0BMU > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > To: > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 9:20 PM > Subject: Re: LF: Loop discussion > > >> Dear James and Alberto, >> >> I must confess that my considerations were much simpler. I wanted to >> find a solution for an outside wire (normal litz wire for electric home >> wiring) loop for broadband reception and to transfer its received energy >> into the shack via a cable. Especially at VLF to MF cable losses are >> rather low. Furthermore I wanted to locate all electronic equipment in >> the shack only, no remote controls or similars. My solution is simple >> and is working according to my expectations. >> >> 73 Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.26/2257 - Release Date: 07/23/09 > 18:00:00 >