Return-Path: Received: from rly-db09.mx.aol.com (rly-db09.mail.aol.com [172.19.130.84]) by air-db01.mail.aol.com (v123.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDB011-ae44a2ee075364; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:21:54 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-db09.mx.aol.com (v123.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDB092-ae44a2ee075364; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:21:43 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ME9gX-00046a-DQ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:20:49 +0100 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ME9gW-00046R-Vk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:20:49 +0100 Received: from smtp805.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([217.146.188.65]) by relay3.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1ME9gV-0007uU-OY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:20:49 +0100 Received: (qmail 56821 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2009 22:20:42 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE; b=gBaLPyUtSX4b8N1DenXVdw/UDy3rVEzYhD45oTcW52tcU/Llk8LqHazUylFSsgvUpR9ZhC6ZIPKmcMrTeGZt3Tn10lTmf/BrBX+qpiibPYnddPFYz2L0sQRe4adaWr+IoX/cRFanRBINujTJy7XUHw3kmdJNwGoKL1UdumiPVFU= ; Received: from unknown (HELO JimPC) (james.moritz@86.177.185.193 with login) by smtp805.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Jun 2009 22:20:41 -0000 X-Yahoo-SMTP: qKIhhNCswBB2TTHr2BORWcGGR2mpopxhCcunGIxpCKQYiG07Q7UOhNo- X-YMail-OSG: lqMW4pYVM1mErOX_Qc9t4wH1M964fhEvvXHBTjVUayoiAmZ4jHJExRVsHdSVdOK0z4HGU1lf3wzBCZ2x1ya3ilbHft9OMW9AIvYcMGj9zwIkq_WfuCXMSyvSPBWxggevL3ZfB0.ZT.nWEedlQ27nnFE4Xf7zThZ3WwFcowoLX2EhS6TcT6.oCfUudGVbm.HRn6wpp1zkzRw2S2bdH9gBZJIRgQ0xFzmoCpIUW5rH9RTnuTKUgpq8LjEeYFq260hRSO4P7uhnaP1NLs8W X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <5A39905CAF744124A2560F59835F8821@JimPC> From: "James Moritz" To: References: In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 23:20:42 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: Re: M0BMU small antenna test beacon Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Dear Dave, Ken, Dave, Rik, Pete, LF Group, Thanks for the reports on the beacon signal. If nothing else, it is at least a viable 500kHz TX antenna - as well as the reports, it is showing up reasonably well on the G3YXM and G4WGT grabbers. I have now closed down at 2206utc. The TX power was about 70W maximum, dropping to about 0.3W at the minimum power level. I haven't done detailed measurements yet, but the loss resistance is about 70 - 80 ohms, and the antenna current just under an amp at maximum power. My "guesstimate" of ERP is 100mW at maximum power, down to 0.4mW at the minimum level - I am allowing -6dB for the fact that the antenna is completely screened by the surrounding trees. The loss resistance is about 3 x that of my normal antenna, which has much more wire. The high resistance isn't a great suprise, as the ends of the top load wires are only a couple of metres from the trees and bushes. From previous experience, in an actual open /P location the loss resistance should be much lower, and the ERP significantly higher for a given antenna current. The TX signal is a .wav file of CW and QRSS recorded from the "digimodes terminal" in Spectrum Lab, and played back through the linear transverter. The software generates a smoothly rounded raised-cosine keying envelope which minimises the bandwidth and results in the "soft" keying. The 5s dashes have a proportionally slower rise/fall - I left it with the default settings to see if anyone would notice, I think on balance a faster rising, sharper keying envelope would be better for a listening test. The variable power level was obtained by editing the audio level in the .wav file using some sound editing software. As Rik observed, I did briefly operate last night as well - power was slightly lower then. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU