Return-Path: Received: from rly-me07.mx.aol.com (rly-me07.mail.aol.com [172.20.83.41]) by air-me04.mail.aol.com (v123.4) with ESMTP id MAILINME044-9c84a184c9836e; Sat, 23 May 2009 15:21:20 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-me07.mx.aol.com (v123.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINME074-9c84a184c9836e; Sat, 23 May 2009 15:20:59 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1M7wlA-0004o8-Mn for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 May 2009 20:19:56 +0100 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1M7wlA-0004nz-5g for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 May 2009 20:19:56 +0100 Received: from imr-d06.mx.aol.com ([205.188.159.7]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1M7wl5-0006TY-Fe for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 May 2009 20:19:56 +0100 Received: from imo-ma04.mx.aol.com (imo-ma04.mx.aol.com [64.12.78.139]) by imr-d06.mx.aol.com (v107.10) with ESMTP id RELAYIN2-34a184c43246; Sat, 23 May 2009 15:19:31 -0400 Received: from G0MRF@aol.com by imo-ma04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v40_r1.5.) id l.bfc.5b998a0d (34893) for ; Sat, 23 May 2009 15:19:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtprly-mb02.mx.aol.com (smtprly-mb02.mx.aol.com [64.12.207.149]) by cia-da01.mx.aol.com (v123.4) with ESMTP id MAILCIADA012-5c674a184c3937f; Sat, 23 May 2009 15:19:25 -0400 Received: from webmail-mf12 (webmail-mf12.webmail.aol.com [64.12.88.225]) by smtprly-mb02.mx.aol.com (v123.4) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYMB025-5c674a184c3937f; Sat, 23 May 2009 15:19:21 -0400 References: <4A181EEC.5050600@btconnect.com> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 15:19:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4A181EEC.5050600@btconnect.com> X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: g0mrf@aol.com X-MB-Message-Type: User X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 42951-STANDARD Received: from 87.80.206.159 by webmail-mf12.sysops.aol.com (64.12.88.225) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Sat, 23 May 2009 15:19:22 -0400 Message-Id: <8CBA9F282F0E172-BD8-2E43@webmail-mf12.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,FORGED_AOL_TAGS=0.281,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,NO_REAL_NAME=0.55,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: First Portable Trip Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CBA9F282FCCD43_BD8_5E0B_webmail-mf12.sysops.aol.com" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=5.0 tests=CLICK_BELOW,FORGED_AOL_TAGS, HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE,HTML_MESSAGE,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 ----------MB_8CBA9F282FCCD43_BD8_5E0B_webmail-mf12.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi Richard. I've used a system similar to yours with some success.? Mine, now dismantled, is detailed at http://www.g0mrf.com/500kAntenna.htm It was a 10m mast with a very small 3m top section. Power in 7.5W PEP. 100km was no problem 24/7 with good conditions it made it to ON and PA.? With very good conditions it made it to?the Scotish Islands at apx 800km but that was rare. The photo shows a variometer in series with a fixed coil in series with another fixed coil which was connected to ground at the bottom end.? Despite all these turns of wire, the 50 ohm match was only a few turns up from the ground end. Hope that helps. David -----Original Message----- From: Richard Newstead To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Sat, 23 May 2009 16:06 Subject: LF: First Portable Trip Not a great success. Tried a 200ft inverted L with 7m vertical section fed against 3 radials each between 50 and 100ft long. The final 100ft was very low - within 1 metre of the ground.? ? Did not succeeded in tuning aerial up in link configuration. Tried tapping the feeder at various points on the main coil but this reduced the Q dramatically and the RX and TX performance were very poor. In configurations where the RX performance was good and the Q high, there was little on no aerial current on transmit. The only configuration that gave some antenna current was nearly useless on receive. Connecting a radial to a metal fence detuned things so much that I go nowhere like that.? ? Heard GW0HXO's beacon at reasonable strength and GW3UEP's beacon - just. Called CQ quite a few times. No takers.? ? Band was still noisy even on relatively remote hilltop with horrible "line-timebase" type burble drifting across band.? ? Clearly more work required to get a viable system. Tips?? ? 73? ? Richard? G3CWI? ? ________________________________________________________________________ AOL Email goes Mobile! You can now read your AOL Emails whilst on the move. Sign up for a free AOL Email account with unlimited storage today. ----------MB_8CBA9F282FCCD43_BD8_5E0B_webmail-mf12.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Hi Richard.

I've used a system similar to yours with some success.  Mine, now dismantled, is detailed at

http://www.g0mrf.com/500kAntenna.htm

It was a 10m mast with a very small 3m top section. Power in 7.5W PEP.
100km was no problem 24/7 with good conditions it made it to ON and PA.  With very good conditions it made it to the Scotish Islands at apx 800km but that was rare.

The photo shows a variometer in series with a fixed coil in series with another fixed coil which was connected to ground at the bottom end.  Despite all these turns of wire, the 50 ohm match was only a few turns up from the ground end.

Hope that helps.

David




-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Newstead <g3cwi@btconnect.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent: Sat, 23 May 2009 16:06
Subject: LF: First Portable Trip

Not a great success. Tried a 200ft inverted L with 7m vertical section fed against 3 radials each between 50 and 100ft long. The final 100ft was very low - within 1 metre of the ground. 
 
Did not succeeded in tuning aerial up in link configuration. Tried tapping the feeder at various points on the main coil but this reduced the Q dramatically and the RX and TX performance were very poor. In configurations where the RX performance was good and the Q high, there was little on no aerial current on transmit. The only configuration that gave some antenna current was nearly useless on receive. Connecting a radial to a metal fence detuned things so much that I go nowhere like that. 
 
Heard GW0HXO's beacon at reasonable strength and GW3UEP's beacon - just. Called CQ quite a few times. No takers. 
 
Band was still noisy even on relatively remote hilltop with horrible "line-timebase" type burble drifting across band. 
 
Clearly more work required to get a viable system. Tips? 
 
73 
 
Richard 
G3CWI 
 
----------MB_8CBA9F282FCCD43_BD8_5E0B_webmail-mf12.sysops.aol.com--