Return-Path: Received: from rly-mg07.mx.aol.com (rly-mg07.mail.aol.com [172.20.83.113]) by air-mg09.mail.aol.com (v123.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMG091-a264a18102bb; Sat, 23 May 2009 11:03:31 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-mg07.mx.aol.com (v123.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMG078-a264a18102bb; Sat, 23 May 2009 11:03:08 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1M7sjm-00041G-MT for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 May 2009 16:02:14 +0100 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1M7sjm-000417-40 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 May 2009 16:02:14 +0100 Received: from imo-m12.mx.aol.com ([64.12.143.100] helo=imo-m12.mail.aol.com) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1M7sjj-0005bh-Ik for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 May 2009 16:02:13 +0100 Received: from imo-ma03.mx.aol.com (imo-ma03.mx.aol.com [64.12.78.138]) by imo-m12.mail.aol.com (v107.10) with ESMTP id RELAYIN3-44a180fe834a; Sat, 23 May 2009 11:02:00 -0400 Received: from G0MRF@aol.com by imo-ma03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v40_r1.5.) id l.c7d.4af23aa3 (37535) for ; Sat, 23 May 2009 11:01:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtprly-ma01.mx.aol.com (smtprly-ma01.mx.aol.com [64.12.207.140]) by cia-mb01.mx.aol.com (v123.4) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMB018-5c444a180fe1161; Sat, 23 May 2009 11:01:58 -0400 Received: from WEBMAIL-MY07 (webmail-my07.sim.aol.com [64.12.108.18]) by smtprly-ma01.mx.aol.com (v123.4) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYMA012-5c444a180fe1161; Sat, 23 May 2009 11:01:53 -0400 References: <8CBA943F0C92715-A70-10C3@WEBMAIL-DZ38.sysops.aol.com> <003401c9db80$36bea390$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 11:01:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <003401c9db80$36bea390$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: g0mrf@aol.com X-MB-Message-Type: User X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 42951-STANDARD Received: from 87.80.206.159 by WEBMAIL-MY07.sysops.aol.com (64.12.108.18) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Sat, 23 May 2009 11:01:53 -0400 Message-Id: <8CBA9CE8AFE47D8-12C4-2051@WEBMAIL-MY07.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag:NO X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,FORGED_AOL_TAGS=0.281,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,NO_REAL_NAME=0.55,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 Subject: LF: Re: CQ DX 500k Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CBA9CE8B056ED7_12C4_41A7_WEBMAIL-MY07.sysops.aol.com" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=5.0 tests=CLICK_BELOW,FORGED_AOL_TAGS, HTML_30_40,HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE,HTML_MESSAGE,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 ----------MB_8CBA9CE8B056ED7_12C4_41A7_WEBMAIL-MY07.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Thanks Mal. Seems like a good idea to stick to your established 7033. However, QSY to 10MHz will not be necessary after all as the WPX contest is next weekend not this one. - My Mistake. 73 David -----Original Message----- From: mal hamilton To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Sat, 23 May 2009 8:26 Subject: LF: Re: CQ DX 500k David That sounds good. I have found 7Mhz good to to the USA evening and night time. I have not tried 10 Mhz but it could be useful to avoid contest acty. Good luck de Mal/g3kev ? ----- Original Message ----- From: g0mrf@aol.com To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org ; G1KAW@aol.com Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 11:29 PM Subject: LF: CQ DX 500k Hi all. ? Can anyone on the East Coast USA comment of the state of 501 -504kHz for transatlantic reception? ? I have confirmed availability of a large field in East Sussex for this Sunday night?for some portable operation. ? If I have to select a frequency, then I may as well choose a clear one possibly in the mid - upper portion of the band say 503.1 ? One potential problem for cross band into Europe using Mals well established 7033kHz is the CQWW WPX contest. - So may have to go to 10MHz for that, or we do have 400W + 16 ele on 2m at 600 ft ASL which should be?fine for ON / F / PA western DL. Locator will be JO00EW near Dallington East Sussex. Power 0 - 250 Watts, antenna dependent. - Aim +10dBW peak ERP Main purpose of this trip is?the antenna experiment, but it would be nice to make some CW / QRSS3 QSOs too. Site location can be seen here. http://www.vhfdx.net/callbook/gmap.php?Lan=E&Call=G1KAW/P&Loc=JO00EW phone / text? 07958502540.? e-mail g0mrf@aol.com. Internet available on site. Thanks David Click here to get the very best of AOL, including news, sport, gossip, lifestyles updates and email. No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.36/2127 - Release Date: 05/21/09 17:51:00 ________________________________________________________________________ AOL Email goes Mobile! You can now read your AOL Emails whilst on the move. Sign up for a free AOL Email account with unlimited storage today. ----------MB_8CBA9CE8B056ED7_12C4_41A7_WEBMAIL-MY07.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Thanks Mal.

Seems like a good idea to stick to your established 7033. However, QSY to 10MHz will not be necessary after all as the WPX contest is next weekend not this one. - My Mistake.

73

David


-----Original Message-----
From: mal hamilton <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent: Sat, 23 May 2009 8:26
Subject: LF: Re: CQ DX 500k

David
That sounds good. I have found 7Mhz good to to the USA evening and night time. I have not tried 10 Mhz but it could be useful to avoid contest acty.
Good luck
de Mal/g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 11:29 PM
Subject: LF: CQ DX 500k

Hi all.
 
Can anyone on the East Coast USA comment of the state of 501 -504kHz for transatlantic reception?
 
I have confirmed availability of a large field in East Sussex for this Sunday night for some portable operation.
 
If I have to select a frequency, then I may as well choose a clear one possibly in the mid - upper portion of the band say 503.1
 
One potential problem for cross band into Europe using Mals well established 7033kHz is the CQWW WPX contest. - So may have to go to 10MHz for that, or we do have 400W + 16 ele on 2m at 600 ft ASL which should be fine for ON / F / PA western DL.

Locator will be JO00EW near Dallington East Sussex.
Power 0 - 250 Watts, antenna dependent. - Aim +10dBW peak ERP

Main purpose of this trip is the antenna experiment, but it would be nice to make some CW / QRSS3 QSOs too.

Site location can be seen here.
http://www.vhfdx.net/callbook/gmap.php?Lan=E&Call=G1KAW/P&Loc=JO00EW

phone / text  07958502540.  e-mail g0mrf@aol.com. Internet available on site.

Thanks

David

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.36/2127 - Release Date: 05/21/09 17:51:00
----------MB_8CBA9CE8B056ED7_12C4_41A7_WEBMAIL-MY07.sysops.aol.com--