Return-Path: Received: from rly-mf03.mx.aol.com (rly-mf03.mail.aol.com [172.20.29.173]) by air-mf01.mail.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMF013-951497daea2371; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:38:04 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-mf03.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMF037-951497daea2371; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:37:57 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1LRQie-0004uM-6N for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:37:36 +0000 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1LRQid-0004uD-Ml for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:37:35 +0000 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.159]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LRQic-0004tL-F9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:37:35 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so3440033fga.32 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 04:37:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=u6tdVWH+9olhwr6ZOdYYzy1NHCdinNZggDcxDCrp8Qk=; b=Td2pV4NP+pPj86KIjiYEfk+uLdfmEnS4qZflEHkVaOiuHa1KdDOAr033VJPoeh3yWj bJq+iaBTQ/8FhPsBHP9Z7i/wFBsb2v6ESQq9FfdW9ldAf35/pXq5uUha8qalb/YmrXL3 0bugMcYBtQRFvynuOPY5i4nH2XJVPiumdQ3yA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CA23OqY/2z4unQcx0dl7FmTiNwScLgdnic4bAtiZchJyFmZOZHYkCctrMKuVo7Ap+E 0sGyN2Y1f4RyMmyrDuJhzeEc1WqHBaSSYfCqsZ5sojoE+7/FxNI4sN0Ks2XVaclai4Y5 mkckohsga0j8o15X6lkPFcCsRy/KEmz8n+y5M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.235.10 with SMTP id i10mr1080612bkh.58.1232973452691; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 04:37:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <001c01c97fae$473a2600$0900a8c0@AM> References: <001c01c97fae$473a2600$0900a8c0@AM> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:37:32 +0000 Message-ID: From: Andy Talbot To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-0.436,SOMETHING_FOR_ADULTS=0.872 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Censorship Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=ADULT_SITE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d305.2 ; domain : googlemail.com DKIM : pass X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) If certain ISPs incorrectly classifiy like this, I wonder if they could be presented with a "Defamation of Character" claim... under Human Rights legislation or whatever. Andy G4JNT www.g4jnt.com 2009/1/26 Alan Melia : > Hi Mark, well at least your ISP does not seem to be blacklisted, because > some are still like Laurence who I think has had to use a different ISP, > because that mail got through. The spambots at some ISPs have been made very > aggressive recently as a result of the "Child Protection pressure" The VLF > Group I sub to was rated as an "adult site" because on poster named his > design "Little Cutie" (It will be interesting to see it this gets through > !!) There have also been problems with some ISPs where a mesage has refered > to the gender of a coax connector !! You might find it interesting to > re-read you failed message for "double entendres" > > Cheers > Alan G3NYK > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mark" > To: > Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 8:26 AM > Subject: LF: Censorship > > > Seems that the spambots are censoring mail to this group > A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its > recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: > > rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > SMTP error from remote mail server after end of data: > host relay2.thorcom.net [193.82.59.130]: 550 This message scored 4.0 > spam points - rejected > > In essence my email said WSPR (and QRSS) are best at the top edge of the > band. They will not interfere much with each other. > My WSPR decoder and grabber is on 24/7 so an agreed frequency is needed for > it to be most effective especially when I am away (a lot recently) > > Mark GM4ISM > > >