DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com;
  h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:Importance:X-MimeOLE:In-Reply-To;
  b=T3SJzunRGAfjrhndhc+bE3et9sP2sEdKBNJST7/MBzJ17DWUEclijOJ3pqkQWuU3Stqrdiq+PYuFx0MGzJBbnJT6+5OX2GZCinc4iS/K9Un6PyOzHEF6CaAzucs6WmiTlf1mSuqlikHQiloR+csK+Zb42bCKNCA+5on9H7ekzL4=  ;
From: "Dave G3WCB" <ganymede444@btopenworld.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:12:39 -0000
Message-ID: <PAEFLMFGBDKKCONLMLBIMEAEDCAA.ganymede444@btopenworld.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <1232140056.4970f718c4d4d@imp.netikka.net>
DomainKey-Status: good (testing) 
Subject: RE: LF: Re: QRG & MSG UPDATE: 136kHz test from OH1LSQ
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


Paul-Henrik, LF,

136.35 kHz is fine for me, it's probably just that the conditions may have
changed. I'll continue to monitor 136.35 for the next few hours.

73, Dave G3WCB IO91RM

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of Paul-Henrik
Sent: 16 January 2009 21:08
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: RE: LF: Re: QRG & MSG UPDATE: 136kHz test from OH1LSQ


Hello Dave, LF

Thanks for reporting!

Yes, that looks like me sending a longer CW ID followed by "TT" in QRSS3. Is
136.35kHz less suited at your QTH due to the local QRM? I can move back up
to
136.40kHz for a while if you think that helps.

73's

Paul-Henrik



Quoting Dave G3WCB <ganymede444@btopenworld.com>:

> Paul-Henrik, LF,
>
> I was definitely seeing traces of your signal around 1900 utc before you
> QSYd. See attached screengrab.
>
> No sign ot the QRSS3 on 136.35, yet.
>
> 73, Dave G3WCB IO91RM
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of Paul-Henrik
> Sent: 16 January 2009 20:47
> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> Subject: Re: LF: Re: QRG & MSG UPDATE: 136kHz test from OH1LSQ
>
>
> Danke Markus!
>
> I'm so positively surprised and if I had a bottle of Champagne it would be
> open
> now. These are very encouraging reports. Perhaps time to start building a
> more
> powerful transmitter now. The antenna is about as good as it gets on this
> property. An elevated loading coil could be worth a try though as the
> vertical
> wire is very near one of the supporting trees and I suspect some of that
> highly
> needed ERP is wasted in it.
>
> Will keep the signal coming for a few more hours, the PSU seems to do the
> job
> (PSU for my old retired Yaesu FT-250).
>
> 73's
>
> Paul-Henrik
>
> Quoting Markus Vester <markusvester@aol.com>:
>
> > ... this it what it looked like here at 20:18. Nice job with 20 mW!
> >
> > 73 - Markus, DF6NM in JN59NK
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "James Moritz" <james.moritz@btopenworld.com>
> > To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> > Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 9:18 PM
> > Subject: LF: Re: QRG & MSG UPDATE: 136kHz test from OH1LSQ
> >
> >
> > Dear Paul-Henrik, LF Group,
> >
> > Now building up to "O" copy...
> >
> > Cheers, Jim Moritz
> > 73 de M0BMU
> >
>
>
>
>