Message-ID: <E4E3119DFE41494D81922B7D718ABA68@AGB>
From: "Graham" <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <20090118215030.1ebe461e@lurcher> <014d01c979b8$88eaea90$6401a8c0@asus>
In-Reply-To: <014d01c979b8$88eaea90$6401a8c0@asus>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 01:18:25 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Importance: Normal
Subject: Re: LF: RE: G0NBD WSPR 503.637
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


Gary,

Thats  odd , I have a good signal from you tonight, decodes at range look to 
be normal
I am +50 Hz with  1550 Hz tone , same dial as you , 502.100 hz

G ..





--------------------------------------------------
From: "Gary - G4WGT" <g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk>
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 10:03 PM
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Subject: LF: RE: G0NBD WSPR 503.637

>
> Hi John, LF,
>
> I have only seen partial traces of G0NBD & no decodes & I am quite close,
> Graham is about 50Hz higher than me.
>
> My dial frequency is 502.100KHz & Tx frequency should be 503.600KHz.
>
> 73
>
> Gary - G4WGT
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of John P-G
> Sent: 18 January 2009 21:51
> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> Subject: LF: G0NBD WSPR 503.637
>
> Hello LF,
>
> G0NBD has been received at up to -5dB here, on 503.637, yet no sign of
> a spot from anyone else on WSPRNET.
>
> I wonder if it's because we're all on different dial frequencies?
>
> Due to Gary using 503.600 RF I decided to shif up in dial freq to
> 502.100, which puts him in the centre of the 200Hz WSPR window, rather
> than right at the top, had I stayed on 502.000
>
> This of cource means anyone using 502.000 won't see the transmission
> from G0NBD.
>
> Can we decide on a dial QRG?
>
> I am going off island first thing in the morning, returning TUesday
> evening, so I'll leave the WSPR setup running. Does anyone have a
> preferrence for which band would be most useful to watch for my
> reported spots?
>
> I'll set up for either 500 or 137 according to the requests I get in
> the next hour or so.
>
> Cheers,
>
> John
>
>
>



>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.9/1900 - Release Date: 1/18/2009 
> 12:11
>