Return-Path: Received: from rly-ma09.mx.aol.com (rly-ma09.mail.aol.com [172.20.116.53]) by air-ma07.mail.aol.com (v121_r5.5) with ESMTP id MAILINMA072-8cb4971a5ae1bb; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 04:32:43 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-ma09.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMA095-8cb4971a5ae1bb; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 04:32:32 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1LO7X3-00079m-QK for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:31:57 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1LO7X2-00079d-UQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:31:56 +0000 Received: from mail6.ssmb.com ([199.67.203.180] helo=mail.citigroup.com) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LO7X0-0003HF-Uz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:31:56 +0000 Received: from imbarc-eu01.eur.nsroot.net (imbarc-eu01.eu.ssmb.com [169.183.21.39]) by imbaspam-eu02.eur.nsroot.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/SSMB_EXT/ev: 22534 $) with ESMTP id n0H9Vlwm002187 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:31:47 GMT Received: from mailhub-dc2.eu.ssmb.com (mailhub-dc2.eur.nsroot.net [169.186.205.199]) by imbarc-eu01.eur.nsroot.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/SSMB_QQQ_IN/1.1) with ESMTP id n0H9Vieq027062 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:31:44 GMT Received: from exuksm03.eur.nsroot.net (EXUKSM03.eur.nsroot.net [169.186.210.14]) by mailhub-dc2.eu.ssmb.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/CG_HUB) with ESMTP id n0H9Vi6l021958 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:31:44 GMT Received: from exukmb49.eur.nsroot.net ([169.183.32.64]) by exuksm03.eur.nsroot.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:31:44 +0000 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6619.12 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:31:43 -0000 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: 137 kHz WSPR tests saturday morning Thread-Index: Acl4hcbbpkzF9kOrQrC3krHIGaxtNwAAHvYw From: "Scholz, Marco " To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Jan 2009 09:31:44.0575 (UTC) FILETIME=[6961FCF0:01C97886] X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 169.186.247.38 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C97886.690250C0" Subject: LF: RE: 137 kHz WSPR tests saturday morning X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) ------_=_NextPart_001_01C97886.690250C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Good morning, good reception of DF0WD=20 092600 18 -11 0.9 11 0 DF0WD JO42 27 =20 092800 9 -20 0.6 0 0 M0BMU IO91 27=20 =20 vy73 Marco DD7PC in JN49ax _____ =20 From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of dl4yhf@freenet.de Sent: 17 January 2009 10:24 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: 137 kHz WSPR tests saturday morning Greetings WSPR spotters and everyone, Many thanks for the WSPR activity. To me, it was a nice way to compare two receiving sites. The first attempt to receive Jim at DF0WD showed: 0900 -7 0.5 0.137500 0 M0BMU IO91 27 (automatic uploading of spots to http://www.wsprnet.org/meptspots.php?mode=3Dhtml&band=3D2190&limit=3D50&find= ca ll=3D&findreporter=3D&sort=3Ddate was off then, and Jim seems to have gone QRT by now. At the same period, the SNR received at home (indoor loop) was -20 dB ... 13 dB less SNR than here at the club station, using the 200 meter wire antenna. What a difference ! I don't know exactly what the ERP is here at the moment (ground is frozen still), but comparing Jim's report to the MEPT database, it seems to be in the same region as M0BMU. Will keep sending at 25 % TX for a short while now. 73, Wolf DL4YHF ( @ df0wd, JO42FD) . -- =20 =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C97886.690250C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Good morning,
good reception of DF0WD
092600=   18=20 -11  0.9    11  0  DF0WD JO42=20 27        
092800   9=20 -20  0.6     0  0  M0BMU IO91 27=20
 
vy73
Marco
DD7PC in JN49ax<= /DIV>
From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= =20 [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of=20 dl4yhf@freenet.de
Sent: 17 January 2009 10:24
To:=20 rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: 137 kHz WSPR tests satur= day=20 morning

Greetings WSPR spotters and everyone,

Many thanks for the=20= WSPR=20 activity.

To me, it was a nice way to compare two receiving sites.The=20 first attempt to receive Jim at DF0WD showed:

0900  -7 =20 0.5   0.137500  0 M0BMU IO91 27

(automatic uploading o= f=20 spots to=20 http://www.wsprnet.org/meptspots.php?mode=3Dhtml&band=3D2190&limit= =3D50&findcall=3D&findreporter=3D&sort=3Ddate

was=20 off then, and Jim seems to have gone QRT by now.

At the same period,=20= the=20 SNR received at home (indoor loop) was -20 dB ... 13 dB less SNR than here a= t=20 the club station, using the 200 meter wire antenna. What a difference !
I= =20 don't know exactly what the ERP is here at the moment (ground is frozen stil= l),=20 but comparing Jim's report to the MEPT database, it seems to be in the same=20 region as M0BMU.

Will keep sending at 25 % TX for a short while=20 now.

73,
  Wolf  DL4YHF ( @ df0wd,  JO42FD)=20 .

--
------_=_NextPart_001_01C97886.690250C0--