Return-Path: Received: from rly-mf03.mx.aol.com (rly-mf03.mail.aol.com [172.20.29.173]) by air-mf05.mail.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMF052-94d49690f3f23a; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:12:43 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-mf03.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMF033-94d49690f3f23a; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:12:33 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1LLl87-0002AS-Jr for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:12:27 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1LLl87-0002AI-6O for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:12:27 +0000 Received: from smtp803.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([217.146.188.63]) by relay3.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LLl86-0008J5-Ff for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:12:27 +0000 Received: (qmail 36321 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2009 21:12:21 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=H4rqiEdqgaDxlIKtzaPSyxvUsGZvXPM8GAgBLm6WiiLQmd9p8i0nJjyJbXr6oaZ1COvYVxGgVbWIsSyxKXXJzDZrG3rlbFjygJ+JF812+Leu8ZA28f+kJOVOaH7Jjj90jc1g53EB775/cW5JB6pP+RpQQiImC0EJnpvorTIZvCk= ; Received: from unknown (HELO JimPC) (james.moritz@86.134.108.92 with login) by smtp803.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Jan 2009 21:12:20 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: ZQaGBAsVM1lHEP6anD51BxWEBRl6joiSq.XNBO5kCfeXClISKWHGibk91wjloZnhNn0a1W8MEjAf7NHv91fw8AdYRcR3jqu01nAq9_.TFl_1.kE438m0O7QufKgosxCNkrrUbNqAhsZdcYu5CH5sFJXbgnT1fyHZaBC.ji8.LL9Q3vaj5niPH_8Oykxc X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <84387F90564C401E836F7871CD6B045B@JimPC> From: "James Moritz" To: References: <5ADF9C3861D84576BE1EF01D07F6D67D@AGB> <42EADF7EF8564D02813B7A0E9301ABF3@AGB> In-Reply-To: <42EADF7EF8564D02813B7A0E9301ABF3@AGB> Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:12:20 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: Re: DominoEX Olivia 8x250 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Dear Graham, LF Group, Still getting patchy copy with both Olivia and Domino EX11. The power levels seem to have dropped abruptly and then returned at least twice during the course of your test. There does not seem to be a great difference between the two modes- I get some copy with either unless the signal has totally faded out, but it is hard to make a good comparison with only short CQ calls and rapidly changing signal levels. An interesting experiment would be to compare the default domino EX11 mode with the same mode but with the FEC enabled. This would give a direct comparison between FEC and non-FEC modes Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU