Return-Path: Received: from rly-mf04.mx.aol.com (rly-mf04.mail.aol.com [172.20.29.174]) by air-mf09.mail.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMF093-959497e45ac1f0; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:22:32 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-mf04.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMF047-959497e45ac1f0; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:22:21 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1LRalv-0003H4-VX for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:21:39 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1LRalv-0003Gv-Dl for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:21:39 +0000 Received: from [193.252.22.190] (helo=smtp6.freeserve.com) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LRalu-0002HU-EG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:21:39 +0000 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3603.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B0CF67000086 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:21:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from AGB (unknown [91.109.17.59]) by mwinf3603.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with SMTP id 789967000085 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:21:30 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20090126232130494.789967000085@mwinf3603.me.freeserve.com Message-ID: <459DB6156FCD43509AAB5F5D7282462C@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <20090126225342.5af9e594@lurcher> In-Reply-To: <20090126225342.5af9e594@lurcher> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:21:29 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8050.1202 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8050.1202 X-Karma: unknown: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: G0NBD difficult to decode Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Thanks John, Its printing ok off air locally , but I am seeing some 'hash' at about -40 db on the spectrum plot .. this im not sure of ... just checked with digipan as a tone generator imd's are well down so its not a tx problem as such .. may be some noise in the exciter audio path , the gains up quite high for a mic at the moment .. I will try setting it back to 0dBm .. that may quieten it a little .. but not tonight .. tnx- G .. -------------------------------------------------- From: "John P-G" Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 10:53 PM To: Subject: LF: G0NBD difficult to decode > > Hello LF, > > I'm seeing really strong signals from G0NBD, and it was decoding > earlier, but now I seem to be unable to get a decode from what should > be a good string (positive S/N ratio) signal. > > I see at WSPRnet that Graham is not being received by quite as many > stations as I'd have expected. I wonder if there's some strangeness > with the soundcard sample rates at either the TX or RX end? I've read > some reports that strong signals often don't decode, when weak ones are > fine, and sample rates are involved? > > Graham, the signal is making it here, bright red on the waterfall, but > the last 3 periods have failed to decode. > > John > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.13/1916 - Release Date: > 1/26/2009 07:08 >