Return-Path: Received: from rly-db04.mx.aol.com (rly-db04.mail.aol.com [172.19.130.79]) by air-db04.mail.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDB044-ac14982147d364; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:41:49 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-db04.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDB047-ac14982147d364; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:41:35 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1LSdhT-0007bo-75 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:41:23 +0000 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1LSdhS-0007bf-R6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:41:22 +0000 Received: from sighthound.demon.co.uk ([80.177.174.126]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LSdhQ-0007u4-Re for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:41:22 +0000 Received: from lurcher (lurcher.twatt.home [10.0.0.8]) by deerhound.twatt.home (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5BD73B65F for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:41:14 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:41:14 +0000 From: John P-G To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <20090129204114.01d053e8@lurcher> In-Reply-To: References: <00f801c98235$a558af20$a402a8c0@Inspiron> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.14.4; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=0.116 Subject: Re: LF: Re: WSPR Timing issue Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:20:07 -0000 "James Moritz" wrote: . > > I suppose this shows that transmission of a frame is initiated by the > real time clock reaching an even minute, but once started, the > generation and timing of the bits in the frame is independent of the > RTC, And occasionally one sees spots reported at WSPRnet with an ODD minute timestamp - how's that done? John