Return-Path: Received: from rly-mf05.mx.aol.com (rly-mf05.mail.aol.com [172.20.29.175]) by air-mf05.mail.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMF053-95b4980b3973a3; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:35:56 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-mf05.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMF051-95b4980b3973a3; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:35:52 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1LSGC9-0006OA-Ss for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:35:29 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1LSGC9-0006O1-Gi for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:35:29 +0000 Received: from sighthound.demon.co.uk ([80.177.174.126]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LSGC8-00009l-Rq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:35:29 +0000 Received: from lurcher (lurcher.twatt.home [10.0.0.8]) by deerhound.twatt.home (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18FA93B6A4 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:35:23 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:35:22 +0000 From: John P-G To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <20090128193522.6a2318ac@lurcher> In-Reply-To: <49809236.3000703@usa.net> References: <20090127214708.59a7e2b4@lurcher> <49809236.3000703@usa.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.14.4; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Re: G0NDB WSPR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:13:26 +0100 Alberto di Bene wrote: > > Just started WSPR again, and see a nice bright trace at approx > > 503.965 in the 20:40 slot, but again no decode. I see no-one else > > reported a successful decode on WSPRnet at that time either. Looks > > like still some problem? > > Could it be that the station that does not decode, albeit being > received strong, is not correctly time aligned ? Dimension4 is a very > nice tool for this. And it is also free... > > 73 Alberto I2PHD > > > Alberto, I think the time is okay on G0NBD's PC, as the periods that do decode show DT of 0.2 seconds, so no great problem I think. The decoding problems seem to be when the S/N rises above about -6dB as reported by the software, as I can decode him well when the signal drops below this level! John