Return-Path: Received: from rly-db01.mx.aol.com (rly-db01.mail.aol.com [172.19.130.76]) by air-db06.mail.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDB061-aa8497e472556; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:28:51 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-db01.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDB016-aa8497e472556; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:28:38 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1LRasQ-0003dD-GY for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:28:22 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1LRasQ-0003d4-0x for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:28:22 +0000 Received: from sighthound.demon.co.uk ([80.177.174.126]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LRasP-0001iD-Af for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:28:21 +0000 Received: from lurcher (lurcher.twatt.home [10.0.0.8]) by deerhound.twatt.home (Postfix) with ESMTP id D25CE3B355 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:28:13 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:28:13 +0000 From: John P-G To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <20090126232813.551c6bfc@lurcher> In-Reply-To: <459DB6156FCD43509AAB5F5D7282462C@AGB> References: <20090126225342.5af9e594@lurcher> <459DB6156FCD43509AAB5F5D7282462C@AGB> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.14.4; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: G0NBD difficult to decode Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:21:29 -0000 "Graham" wrote: > Thanks John, > > Its printing ok off air locally , but I am seeing some 'hash' at > about -40 db Okay Graham, I see others reporting inconsistent decodes of you on the chat page at WSPRnet, so it's not just me. The last few have been okay, and weaker. I'm having no trouble with Jim's +5dB signal, so absolute strength doesn't seem to be the problem, but your sig is certainly easier when it's weaker, which is counterintuitive! Off to bed now, will leave RX running, spots to WSPRnet. GN John