Return-Path: Received: from rly-db03.mx.aol.com (rly-db03.mail.aol.com [172.19.130.78]) by air-db10.mail.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDB102-ab7497d6c8041; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 02:55:58 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-db03.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDB035-ab7497d6c8041; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 02:55:46 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1LRMJI-0008Lx-Eh for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:55:08 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1LRMJI-0008Lo-0R for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:55:08 +0000 Received: from cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([134.58.240.44]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LRMJG-00048a-3H for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:55:07 +0000 Received: from smtps01.kuleuven.be (smtpshost01.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.74]) by cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2CC51C006 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:54:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtps01.kuleuven.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtps01.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD17631E703 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:54:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from dell-rik.fys.kuleuven.be (dhcp-10-33-85-199.fys.kuleuven.be [10.33.85.199]) by smtps01.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE6F631E702 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:54:57 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:55:20 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe In-Reply-To: <20090125180430.1d63e1c7@lurcher> References: <20090125092908.0aec06a4@lurcher> <7EC707A6E2D94414AEBBC52C6159581C@JimPC> <002001c97f0a$cf16fac0$ae01a8c0@youry0mkaz8jaq> <20090125165335.47fc3399@lurcher> <7690F13DCE5D44BA8A5AA126607E7979@JimPC> <20090125180430.1d63e1c7@lurcher> Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20090126075457.AE6F631E702@smtps01.kuleuven.be> X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 >At the moment there is no bandplan, but general concensus would >indicate "beacons at the band edges - real QSOs in the middle". > >The current WSPR activity around 503.5 (502.0 dial) seems reasonable, >although moving up a few hundred Hz wouldn't hurt, say to 502.3 dial >which gives a 200Hz window at 503.7 - 503.9 I agree with that. In addition I would suggest to keep QRSS QSO's (lazy men's CW, very slow CW or wthatever called) also at one of the band edges. A strong QRSS signal in the centre of the band can block a good part of the 3kHz segment during a longer time for weak CW signals. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm