Return-Path: Received: from rly-mg07.mx.aol.com (rly-mg07.mail.aol.com [172.20.83.113]) by air-mg06.mail.aol.com (v121_r5.5) with ESMTP id MAILINMG064-a244973a4382eb; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:50:56 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-mg07.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMG076-a244973a4382eb; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:50:50 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1LOfXS-0001KK-CI for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 21:50:38 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1LOfXS-0001KB-11 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 21:50:38 +0000 Received: from sighthound.demon.co.uk ([80.177.174.126]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LOfXR-0006by-AT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 21:50:37 +0000 Received: from lurcher (lurcher.twatt.home [10.0.0.8]) by rsync.twatt.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34EF83B731 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 21:50:31 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 21:50:30 +0000 From: John P-G To: Message-ID: <20090118215030.1ebe461e@lurcher> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.14.4; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Karma: unknown: X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=1.166 Subject: LF: G0NBD WSPR 503.637 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Hello LF, G0NBD has been received at up to -5dB here, on 503.637, yet no sign of a spot from anyone else on WSPRNET. I wonder if it's because we're all on different dial frequencies? Due to Gary using 503.600 RF I decided to shif up in dial freq to 502.100, which puts him in the centre of the 200Hz WSPR window, rather than right at the top, had I stayed on 502.000 This of cource means anyone using 502.000 won't see the transmission from G0NBD. Can we decide on a dial QRG? I am going off island first thing in the morning, returning TUesday evening, so I'll leave the WSPR setup running. Does anyone have a preferrence for which band would be most useful to watch for my reported spots? I'll set up for either 500 or 137 according to the requests I get in the next hour or so. Cheers, John