Return-Path: Received: from rly-df01.mx.aol.com (rly-df01.mail.aol.com [172.19.156.14]) by air-df01.mail.aol.com (v121_r5.5) with ESMTP id MAILINDF011-52549805fd22db; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:38:35 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-df01.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDF012-52549805fd22db; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:38:28 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1LSAcJ-00024D-7x for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:38:07 +0000 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1LSAcI-000244-Hj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:38:06 +0000 Received: from smtp-out-4.talktalk.net ([62.24.128.234] helo=smtp.talktalk.net) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LSAcH-00038M-26 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:38:06 +0000 X-Path: TTSMTP X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap8LAI/uf0lUDVpr/2dsb2JhbAAThEmIEY8WkHifJ4RVcgaCeg Received: from host-84-13-90-107.opaltelecom.net.90.13.84.in-addr.arpa (HELO mal769a60aa920) ([84.13.90.107]) by smtp.talktalk.net with SMTP; 28 Jan 2009 13:37:57 +0000 Message-ID: <004401c9814d$a118ed00$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <004f01c9809a$708b5c30$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <15F27D85CDCF44D08A47D3D50019AD5D@DR2> <00a701c980ac$47ecc7c0$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:37:56 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=0.257 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: PROPAGATION WSPR Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Is there any tfc list and exchange of traffic on the freq. I have hrd some ships calling although not recently on 500 khz, mostly far east ships. mal/g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "Laurence BY3A-KL1X China" To: Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 1:21 PM Subject: RE: LF: Re: Re: PROPAGATION WSPR Coastal stations are still running, well XSG on A1A is anyway on 522.5 Hz - Im not sure of the power Shanghai radio puts out but from field measurements its probably in the 1Kw range. Laurence - stuck in Singapore.... From: g3kevmal@talktalk.net To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:22:58 +0000 Subject: LF: Re: Re: PROPAGATION WSPR That is a more sensible power for MF. Coastal stns were running in excess of this power and ships between 1 - 2 kw so whats new. Radio amateurs are at a disatvantage at present but could handle it, but appliance operators NO. G3KEV ----- Original Message ----- From: dave.riley3 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 4:31 PM Subject: LF: Re: PROPAGATION WSPR NEWS FLASH The NEHRS,Inc. has been granted by the FCC the call letter WNE for MF CW operation on 472 KHz and 500 KHz at a maximum power of 5000 watts. Hope some of you guys get your T2 license to run the station after construction. As soon as the snow melts and temperatures rise a bit the large vertical will be errected. My QTH can only be temporary so we must find a permanent home ASAP. 73, Steve WA1HUD President NEHRS, Inc. http://nehrs.net/default.aspx ----- Original Message ----- From: mal hamilton To: rsgb Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 11:15 AM Subject: LF: PROPAGATION WSPR On LF I do not think wspr is the correct mode to study propagation as suggested by some. Two procedures are required with the mode. First it has to be detected then analyised and decoded into a print format to be viewed. Morse sent in the QRS mode at a suitable speed between 1 and 120 sec dot only requires one procedure, to be detected and viewed and would give a good indication of propagation whether used for QSO purposed or otherwise. I have pointed out recently that I have observed all of the traces from those transmitting WSPR and had the carrier been directly keyed in QRS mode an ID or intellegence would have been conveyed, whereas only part of the time was the signals decoded in wspr. For those viewing the print format only and getting no copy would never know whether the signall was being received or if it was faulty sampling and decoding. Cut out the second procedure of decoding, avoid ambiguity and use the slow keyed carried method using morse code or murray code. A waterfall display and the EYE is a very sensitive detector, For those experimenting with data modes have fun but todate in the amateur radio LF/MF context nothing yet has surpassed the use of slow morse keyed at a speed to suit one's needs ie propagation studies or communication between two stations. mal/g3kev No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.14/1917 - Release Date: 1/26/2009 6:37 PM _________________________________________________________________ Windows Live™: E-mail. Chat. Share. Get more ways to connect. http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t2_allup_explore_012009 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.15/1921 - Release Date: 1/28/2009 6:37 AM