Return-Path: Received: from rly-dc03.mx.aol.com (rly-dc03.mail.aol.com [172.19.136.32]) by air-dc01.mail.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDC013-b1149566fee93; Sat, 27 Dec 2008 13:12:09 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-dc03.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDC035-b1149566fee93; Sat, 27 Dec 2008 13:12:02 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1LGddU-0008Uv-6M for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:11:40 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1LGddT-0008Um-31 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:11:39 +0000 Received: from cmsout02.mbox.net ([165.212.64.32]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LGddS-00055k-4D for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:11:39 +0000 Received: from cmsout02.mbox.net (cm02-lo [127.0.0.1]) by cmsout02.mbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B85C1341C4 for ; Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:11:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cmsapps03.cms.usa.net [165.212.11.132] by cmsout02.mbox.net via smtad (C8.MAIN.3.45U) with ESMTP id XID160mLAsLd9938X02; Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:11:29 -0000 X-USANET-Source: 165.212.11.132 IN dibene@usa.net cmsapps03.cms.usa.net X-USANET-MsgId: XID160mLAsLd9938X02 Received: from [127.0.0.1] [151.47.208.158] by cmsapps03.cms.usa.net (ESMTPA/dibene@usa.net) via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.48O) with ESMTPA id 113mLAsLb6272M39; Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:11:27 -0000 X-USANET-Auth: 151.47.208.158 AUTH dibene@usa.net [127.0.0.1] Message-ID: <49566FCD.5080208@usa.net> Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:11:25 +0100 From: Alberto di Bene User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <495466BF.9080402@yahoo.com> <49564E54.2060402@usa.net> <006501c96840$4ddd6380$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <49565AB6.1060002@usa.net> <008201c9684c$409e01f0$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> In-Reply-To: <008201c9684c$409e01f0$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 081124-0, 11/24/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Z-USANET-MsgId: XID113mLAsLC6272X39 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: Re: WSPR and CW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) mal hamilton wrote: > Glad to hear ur ears are in good shape. QRS is a CW MODE just slower than > normal hand sent speed, QRS 1 - 3 is far superior to wspr. It can be read > off the screen when wspr will not print out. This is a fact I have observed > it every time. WSPR is alright if you want to use it but it is certainly not > a superior mode. > g3kev Well, everybody is entitled to his own ideas, no matter how wrong they are... {:-) {:-) 73 Alberto I2PHD