Return-Path: Received: from rly-mh06.mx.aol.com (rly-mh06.mail.aol.com [172.21.166.142]) by air-mh04.mail.aol.com (v121_r5.5) with ESMTP id MAILINMH044-bd949549c675f; Fri, 26 Dec 2008 03:57:17 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-mh06.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMH061-bd949549c675f; Fri, 26 Dec 2008 03:57:13 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1LG8V1-0006XR-KU for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Dec 2008 08:56:51 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1LG8V1-0006XI-45 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Dec 2008 08:56:51 +0000 Received: from smtp2e.orange.fr ([80.12.242.113]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LG8V0-0003TK-E9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Dec 2008 08:56:50 +0000 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf2e24.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 000C3700008C for ; Fri, 26 Dec 2008 09:56:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from JR (Mix-Dijon-107-4-174.w193-248.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.248.3.174]) by mwinf2e24.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1A8E97000085 for ; Fri, 26 Dec 2008 09:56:43 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20081226085644108.1A8E97000085@mwinf2e24.orange.fr Message-ID: <200812260956420185.069D35DA@smtp.wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <8CB34B6C8161776-D34-101D@MBLK-M29.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag:NO References: <008c01c9652f$5e5d4950$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <4951C1F1.3040101@telus.net> <008601c965ba$cc55fe80$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <495279D4.9050603@telus.net> <00da01c965f7$4f3f5d50$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <8CB34B6C8161776-D34-101D@MBLK-M29.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag:NO X-Mailer: Courier 3.50.00.09.1098 (http://www.rosecitysoftware.com) (P) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 09:56:42 +0100 From: "John RABSON" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: Why WSPR when you can SHOUT! was Re: LF: wspr Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 25/12/2008 at 09:47 g4gvw@aol.com wrote: >Once upon a time there was only CW but thankfully someone with more >imagination than a sea-going radiotelegraphist was driven to find other >modes and methods. I remember reading somewhere that "professional" >telegraphists once objected to any kind of "bug-key" being used in a real >"office"! One of my lecturers told me that in the 1960s the GPO still banned bugs for=20= ship/shore from UK vessels. Seasons greetings. John F5VLF