Return-Path: Received: from rly-dc08.mx.aol.com (rly-dc08.mail.aol.com [172.19.136.37]) by air-dc07.mail.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDC074-b364937dda92a2; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 08:40:07 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-dc08.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDC082-b364937dda92a2; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 08:40:04 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1L8EMg-0007f6-NK for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 13:35:34 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1L8EMg-0007ex-A9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 13:35:34 +0000 Received: from smtp810.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([217.146.188.70]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1L8EMa-0000g3-1V for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 13:35:34 +0000 Received: (qmail 87662 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2008 13:35:14 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE; b=hH5uU/mQb/3s3jT/psC1o2DdYmu6NDER+iY7+1rd7I5Qw5xADVA6w+9qE71Fqu945I/P9qqMvH8NmM8UDnNFx9DYT0h3R4YHgN8EsjF7WH8ei5CMkLo9wFOMAvKK+rxEURQYCMx6O/r5jBt4+CWYlRtgZ6qR7DNinDn/LeHkCFQ= ; Received: from unknown (HELO w4o8m9) (james.moritz@86.135.189.23 with login) by smtp810.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2008 13:35:13 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: 3s3Hv0sVM1mNSUDjT.qOmlbfXBqntoTMcAAc4ljJmWycLbcIy2CpgG93cop9Qi6nII2eZFsfE__D3M30hEzJ05wRCCpV..3sRPzgslbYyZZvJrKcavHSHTAd8GIgfN1.dJkKMUDHQAgB3jT_CJhWPnLVUzTLy56001HE6u0- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.5.549 [270.8.5/1757]); Wed, 03 Dec 2008 13:34:46 +0000 Message-ID: <000701c9554b$e85284c0$4201a8c0@home> From: "James Moritz" To: Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 13:34:45 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Karma: 0: DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: Re: WA1ZMS Loop design Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Dear Mike, Chris, LF group, I would agree with Chris' comments regarding Op-amp suitability - the preamp circuit appears to be designed for 40dB voltage gain, which it won't achieve at MF with an OP-27 or even less a 741. The article gives values of gain from 34dB at 25kHz down to 10dB at 500kHz, although it doesnot say under what conditions this was measured. I'm sure the circuit "works" in the sense that it gives some useful gain, but operating it in this way means linearity is poor, input impedance is reduced and output impedance increased, i.e. you lose all the advantages of using an op-amp in the first place. The 9V supply is a bit low for these op-amps also. With a reasonable receiver sensitivity, you would not need much gain with this kind of loop arangement - assuming a loaded Q of 100, I calculate the voltage at the loop terminals at resonance will be about 1.3uV for a 1uV/m field strength. The noise in a 500Hz bandwidth at the loop terminals would be about 0.4uV just due to the loop itself, with a similar level due to external band noise on a quiet band. The internal noise of better receivers would be swamped even with 0dB preamp gain, i.e. just a buffer, although you might want 10 - 20 dB if your RX is a bit deaf at 500k. The remarks about the loop bandwidth in the article are a bit mysterious - it implies the bandwidth is wide and that tuning is not critical, but my experience with this type of loop is that Q of 100 - 200 is normal, giving a bandwidth of a few kHz at 500k, so tuning is critical. My experience with op-amps as RF preamplifiers is that they can be made to work quite well, but are not any simpler or better performing than discrete component circuits in this frequency range. Check out the variable-gain loop preamp on G3YXM's "circuits" page for example. Video op-amps can be used well into the HF range, but like all high-frequency, high gain devices with feedback, care is needed to avoid instability! Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU