Return-Path: Received: from rly-dc07.mx.aol.com (rly-dc07.mail.aol.com [172.19.136.36]) by air-dc10.mail.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDC104-b344925ba2f3e6; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:27:54 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-dc07.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDC078-b344925ba2f3e6; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:27:45 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1L3FB0-0000g9-1x for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:26:54 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1L3FAz-0000g0-E8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:26:53 +0000 Received: from smtp813.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([217.146.188.73]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1L3FAy-0008TB-B8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:26:53 +0000 Received: (qmail 89864 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2008 19:26:46 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:Importance:In-Reply-To; b=x/Bpt3/eQWviMC9YBSb0KIEnBGx/JB8EMD+aVQGWsDZQg+Y/e2HwbziRznIFCU0XKJGmVylgLVdtPbQPbJlEGfYpQGPkYX2c2ts6CUzX2sYK7ZmoY5inXzo5Y2P8Pmzyau8GG2cvwKMTdqK3AGnQNGAViAyATuxBvATJ5sj5s50= ; Received: from unknown (HELO aquarids) (ganymede444@81.153.226.196 with login) by smtp813.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Nov 2008 19:26:46 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: pZg_oxEVM1kgkp7TiXOI43KY2Y.KE6nJhJH4BMPFKlvQ_5Vu39o9969jaRJwzIdGRK.JydvKSptfmYV0jsA.8VmBTxa38FkISfXkB5m7R6bD2ooQ_tHFP49r9n1Y9GQoSexO7WxI2VtAm94ZaNZzVw_9_rjoIMnv1QtmzhvWI.7vBs6uex26uBMxuYw- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: "Dave G3WCB" To: Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:28:16 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1914 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <1227193859.49257e0306cc6@imp.netikka.net> X-Karma: 0: DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: RE: LF: Re: 3C85/90 Toroids Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.1 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, NO_EXPERIENCE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Paul-Henrik, LF, You are correct. 3C85 is a ferrite, and has been widely used in transformer cores at LF, as reported by G0MRF and others. I have no experience of the material personally, as I have never been able to find any, and have been forced to use other "street" ferrite from PC PSUs, ferrite EMC sleeves or "slugs", etc. Two 40mm long 25mm dia ferrite sleeves taped together in "binocular" style work fine at 400W on 137 kHz >From this I conclude that the core material for transformers isn't too important, providing it isn't too lossy, and can provide a reasonable inductance (turns per mH). I have never tried T200-2 as a core transformer material. I suspect that it would not be too lossy, but because the permeability is much lower than ferrite, you would have to put a lot of turns on the core to get a suitably high inductance. T130-2 and T200-2 powder iron cores do indeed make good inductors for the low-pass filters. None of the "street ferrite" I tried worked, and in most cases got fiercely hot. Air-cored inductors work well, but need to be wound with quite thick wire to keep the copper lossed low. In my 400W LF TX, I got more output with the T200-2 inductors than the air-cored conductors because I could reduce the length of wire needed for the inductors, and reduce losses due to resistance of the wire. I've never tried T200-3 or any other mix. 73, Dave G3WCB IO91RM -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of Paul-Henrik Sent: 20 November 2008 15:11 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Re: 3C85/90 Toroids I forgot to mention one important thing in my last reply: >From the earlier discussions on this subject I got the impression that T130-3 and T200-2 cores were suggested as alternatives to the 3C85/3C90. The mixes #2 and #3 are powder iron, not ferrite as the 3F3 and 3C85/3C90. I beleive they are poorly suited as power transformers on LF/MF but make good inductors for low-pass filters on 136 and 500kHz. This is true at least for the #2 mix. On 500kHz I remember seeing reports of severe LPF heating with the #3 mix, I will have to check again on that. Some of the gurus please correct me if I'm wrong here. I just wanted to press the "pause and think again" button before someone possibly orders inductor cores to use for a transformer. I'm still a beginner/learner in this game, the above is just how I see things today. 73's Paul-Henrik Quoting "Johan H. Bodin" : > Yes, 3F3 is even better than 3C85/3C90 for power transformation at a few > hundred > kHz. The 3F3 cores, if coloured, are light blue. Philips sold their ferrite > business to Ferroxcube: http://www.ferroxcube.com/ > > 73 > Johan SM6LKM > > > Paul-Henrik wrote: > > Have a look at Ferroxcube (Philips) cores of 3F3 material. As far as I can > > interpret datasheets for these, they should work fairly well as > transformers up > > to 500kHz with a DC component and up to 1MHz without DC. > >