Return-Path: Received: from rly-md09.mx.aol.com (rly-md09.mail.aol.com [172.20.29.147]) by air-md01.mail.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMD011-927492dc1d9db; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:38:38 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-md09.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMD097-927492dc1d9db; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:38:35 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1L5S5D-0000nb-1B for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:38:03 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1L5S5C-0000nS-Kt for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:38:02 +0000 Received: from smtp105.prem.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([98.136.44.60]) by relay3.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1L5S5C-0005UC-6Y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:38:02 +0000 Received: (qmail 4375 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2008 21:37:55 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Wz8qFfjdIAZ6x+UvNyJVT/GNpsJUpWY/k/gatLjMfsx24Nr604LUvPuOeEevoUpX1vGfvgiqb4pIPog1nHPv2wLQqXjKh2YPdxEGelNq81B0eMN4BdJQvt3wQnVv3VbxRQ5XPBN31LCb7yn2a3jwf7ZlJT14AoWAosgUo8p2Xts= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.105?) (we0h@75.168.149.218 with plain) by smtp105.prem.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Nov 2008 21:37:55 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: hxSrs80VM1mbYgmmo04NG7u2YzAFuPNXtmcFFPBZ4KhcGigN1FRiK0VOJeyKARtA7yOPp2_3QJdRm2DN9AqUZovPub5a5Qe8HAuW5AHa0hDvKo.EU59qu2bFJqDUE6Iw2RAHBa4SvFZHi6HfLy1jWV9IaEAsUOSsAn783M0s X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <492DC1B0.9000907@yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:37:52 -0600 From: Mike-WE0H User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081125) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <005301c94ff5$daf65b90$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> In-Reply-To: <005301c94ff5$daf65b90$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> DomainKey-Status: good (testing) Subject: Re: LF: LV V MF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Opposite here in the US. More 600m operating than on LF. Mike WE0H /16 mal hamilton wrote: > It looks like LF is gaining momentrum in QSO terms while MF/600M is in > decline. > G3KEV > >