DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
  b=Dq9/ryYBn50m/J9+l3BJ8VeFGW9XgfA1WgjusY2qKNCKOEqB/w+ruRo7+6f8dlX+s7tdNAILB5O0rMNhIHqJ7HujovYuzMhD3ca86NqJFwJsrd8A4IBBU3k80ddYhuKRhLm7ia4DqzlWhQo5aC1l7I1RPu1RaCZDflq/yH0Y5KQ=  ;
Message-ID: <49290806.9070006@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 01:36:38 -0600
From: Mike WE0H <we0h@yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <000501c94c0b$0b922c50$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL>	 <006a01c94c0d$9b14d790$6401a8c0@asus>	 <003101c94c17$0a88dc30$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> <57a24ca70811211340w4446a52cn7470f2cafb351894@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <57a24ca70811211340w4446a52cn7470f2cafb351894@mail.gmail.com>
DomainKey-Status: good (testing) 
Subject: Re: LF: Re: RE: WE2XGR/2 QRSS10 / CW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


Not me, my amp is old being a 1976 design but my Kenwood is 1980's 
technology...hi hi...I think my transverter was built in 2007?
I am running a QRSS-1 signal for Pat right now (0736z) on 507.90kc. Any 
of you guys want to use what the admin guy says I should be using,
go ahead & use it as I go anywhere in the band where I see an opening. I 
tend to stay above 506.50kc usually but not always...hi hi...

Mike
WE0H
/16


Warren  wrote:
> Jay and the list,
>
>    Actually WD2XSH group uses 505.200 - 505.250 for QRSS,
> 505.250-505.270 was suggested for the XGR group.
>
> In practice it shouldn't make a difference since only 1 of the XSH
> group ever uses QRSS and then only rarely.
> (The rest of the WD2XSH group is constitutionally opposed to using any
> technology developed after WWII ! )
>
> 73 Warren K2ORS
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 3:23 PM,  Jay wrote:
>   
>> Gary
>>
>> Okay. How about 505.240? I have to be below 505.250 to avoid the XSH gang
>> that 'owns' 505.25 - 505.27 kHz for their QRSS activity.
>>
>> Jay
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary - G4WGT" 
>>
>>
>>     
>>> Jay,
>>>
>>> That frequency will only be about 20Hz above one of the EU beacons, have a
>>> look at my   grabber to see the 3 or 4 beacons there.
>>>
>>> http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor/grabber2.html
>>>
>>> If there is a RTTY signal at about 505.800KHz ignore it, just an image.
>>>
>>> 73
>>>
>>> Gary - G4WGT.