Return-Path: Received: from rly-df10.mx.aol.com (rly-df10.mail.aol.com [172.19.156.23]) by air-df02.mail.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDF023-58349236ea717e; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:41:13 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-df10.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDF106-58349236ea717e; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:40:59 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1L2c31-0005wX-6w for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:40:03 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1L2c30-0005wO-E4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:40:02 +0000 Received: from mailout11.t-online.de ([194.25.134.85]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1L2c2z-0002BD-3g for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:40:02 +0000 Received: from fwd02.aul.t-online.de by mailout11.sul.t-online.de with smtp id 1L2c2w-000340-00; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 02:39:58 +0100 Received: from [192.168.2.22] (XKAGeOZAQh66VGQFK0xuQMbwggqFyPVRBhDY9Ax92PDv5484oTeKEa-jduBRRpiwSH@[217.95.106.155]) by fwd02.t-online.de with esmtp id 1L2c2m-28Up3g0; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 02:39:48 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: hajo.brandt.dj1zb@t-online.de To: X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 6.06.0002 Date: 19 Nov 2008 01:39 GMT Message-ID: <1L2c2m-28Up3g0@fwd02.t-online.de> X-ID: XKAGeOZAQh66VGQFK0xuQMbwggqFyPVRBhDY9Ax92PDv5484oTeKEa-jduBRRpiwSH X-TOI-MSGID: 7bd496f5-a103-4b29-b724-ef47a858096c X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.452,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,NO_REAL_NAME=0.55,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: GI4DPE in JN68GN Content-Type: Multipart/Alternative; Boundary="__Next_1227058781_Part81__" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD, HTML_MESSAGE,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 --__Next_1227058781_Part81__ Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit Dear all, until this night (November 18 to 19) I have had problems to hear GI4DPE at all for several weeks in eastern Bavaria, in spite of seeing him on the Shetland grabber and that he could be copied 589 in Belgium. Tonight I could detect him by ear at around 01.00 UTC, but he was rather weak, worse than SK6RUD. For the time being it is my impression that this November the condx on 500 kHz are not as good as last year, when I could make my first crossband qsos 600m/80m. But I continue to listen; hopefully I will be wrong at the end. 73 Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB "Rik Strobbe" schrieb: Hello Dennis, it was GI4DPE beaconing last night on 501.5 kHz. Finbar was peaking 589 here. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T At 13:29 18/11/2008, you wrote: Hi Everyone Just finished a top band natter last night at 2015 UTC when I heard WI4DPE beacon rst 539 on approx. 501.5kHz. Must tell someone as it is first time I have heard anyone on this band outside the UK, so my experimental loop aerials can't be all bad. The signal from the fixed 1metre loop hammered on the back fence looking North South was slightly worse than the 8" ferrite rod mounted in an ice cream box on a post 1m high and looking 20 degrees West of North. I would welcome any views on wire loops v ferrite rods on the 600m band? Dennis M0JXM Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm for more information. --__Next_1227058781_Part81__ Content-Type: Text/HTML; Charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit T-Online eMail Dear all,

until this night (November 18 to 19) I have had problems to hear GI4DPE at all for several weeks in eastern Bavaria, in spite of seeing him on the Shetland grabber and that he could be copied 589 in Belgium.

Tonight I could detect him by ear at around 01.00 UTC, but he was rather weak, worse than SK6RUD.

For the time being it is my impression that this November the condx on 500 kHz are not as good as last year, when I could make my first crossband qsos 600m/80m.
 

But I continue to listen; hopefully I will be wrong at the end.

73 Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB


 
"Rik Strobbe" <rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be> schrieb:
Hello Dennis,

it was GI4DPE beaconing last night on 501.5 kHz.
Finbar was peaking 589 here.

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T

At 13:29 18/11/2008, you wrote:
Hi Everyone
 
Just finished a top band natter last night at 2015 UTC when I heard WI4DPE beacon rst 539 on approx. 501.5kHz.  Must tell someone as it is first time I have heard anyone on this band outside the UK, so my experimental loop aerials can't be all bad.   The signal from the fixed 1metre loop hammered on the back fence looking North South was slightly worse than the 8" ferrite rod mounted in an ice cream box on a post 1m high and looking 20 degrees West of North.   I would welcome any views on wire loops v ferrite rods on the 600m band?
 
Dennis M0JXM


Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm for more information.

  --__Next_1227058781_Part81__--