Return-Path: Received: from rly-db03.mx.aol.com (rly-db03.mail.aol.com [172.19.130.78]) by air-db07.mail.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDB074-ab84914cdf123; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:23:58 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-db03.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDB036-ab84914cdf123; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:23:32 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Kyafc-0002og-1Z for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 23:23:16 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Kyafb-0002oX-AW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 23:23:15 +0000 Received: from web28103.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.182.123]) by relay3.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Kyafb-0001kR-17 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 23:23:15 +0000 Received: (qmail 94976 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Nov 2008 23:23:09 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=Yw0wSZwufOkdLB9rLfkxidzcMJqRQFXG+0jOdZ9VDm7p3NJu/QQY8BjULq/VgvxVCmOoclhdtFtBDWKWRv1ZEYO8sOsfwjpwH9sa1DQSNGffiDsusq5p7IzL9kEb7+k9aSKHlZYUgAZ8h3eJS2OTZ58BMo55gkrCUm8+JF1oAu0=; X-YMail-OSG: VFMCSvIVM1khxAVIQESdDsxRTEMyiE18981IZ54W8G0vNatEcqxT2plGLaAPYPAgi.Pi9uB5swkXwR8b6vxtmHFwH7rbbPqkiOGboCcXfR7zRUD7Oye6CRzSYTOonWuDBtcVK526DuL5X.fduHJWExhcImhMck858cYy3za7o2ZbKAQ- Received: from [86.152.86.80] by web28103.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 23:23:08 GMT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.260.1 Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 23:23:08 +0000 (GMT) From: M0FMT To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <128973.94319.qm@web28103.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> DomainKey-Status: good (testing) Subject: Re: LF: M0FMT calling CQ ON on 502.2kHz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-144611375-1226100188=:94319" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 --0-144611375-1226100188=:94319 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Rik =C2=A0 Just checked the reflector, OK you did get my report OK then I spent too lon= g sending and lost the final so was not sure if you got my report to you. Th= e QSB was deep but when you passed it back to me about 20:32 UTC you were go= od and readable at 549 I hope you got that I have 539 for me on my pad here.= I carried on calling ON in case we had not completed. Looks like we did. So= thank you very much for persevering with me and I hope to contact you again= on 500 I have heard you stronger in the past so there will be other contact= s. It was a good night for activity but=C2=A0I think conditions were poor ow= ing to QSB / QRN. 73 Petefmt =C2=A0 Hi Paul Henrik =C2=A0 Thank you very much for the report to night. GW3UEP, GI4DPE, G3KEV, G3XPU al= l received hear with QSB, I pulled out at about 21:10 UTC. 73 petefmt --- On Fri, 7/11/08, Rik Strobbe wrote: From: Rik Strobbe Subject: Re: LF: M0FMT calling CQ ON on 502.2kHz To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Friday, 7 November, 2008, 9:00 PM I can hear Pete 539 now calling CQ ON. We had a qso earlier tonight that ended in QRN and QSB, but reports =20 were exchanged so it is a valid QSO, unless I missed something. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Quoting Paul-Henrik : > Hello LF > > Just received M0FMT's CQ ON around 502.2kHz > > Q3 to Q5 signal. > > > 73's > > Paul-Henrik / OH1LSQ > Vaasa / KP03SD > > Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm =20 --0-144611375-1226100188=:94319 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Rik
 
Just checked the reflector, OK you did get my report OK then I spent to= o long sending and lost the final so was not sure if you got my report to yo= u. The QSB was deep but when you passed it back to me about 20:32 UTC<= /SPAN> you were good and readable at 549 I hope you got that I have 539 for=20= me on my pad here. I carried on calling ON in case we had not completed. Loo= ks like we did. So thank you very much for persevering with me and I hope to contact you again on 500 I have heard you stronge= r in the past so there will be other contacts. It was a good night for activ= ity but I think conditions were poor owing to QSB / QRN. 73 Petefmt
 
Hi Paul Henrik
 
Thank you very much for the report to night. GW3UEP, GI4DPE, G3KEV, G3X= PU all received hear with QSB, I pulled out at about 21:10 UTC.
73 petefmt

--- On Fri, 7/11/08, Rik Strobbe &= lt;Rik.Strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be> wrote:
From: Rik Strobbe <Rik.Strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be>Subject: Re: LF: M0FMT calling CQ ON on 502.2kHz
To: rsgb_lf_group@blac= ksheep.org
Date: Friday, 7 November, 2008, 9:00 PM

I can hear=
 Pete 539 now calling CQ ON.
We had a qso earlier tonight that ended in QRN and QSB, but reports =20
were exchanged so it is a valid QSO, unless I missed something.

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T


Quoting Paul-Henrik <phl@netikka.fi>:

> Hello LF
>
> Just received M0FMT's CQ ON around 502.2kHz
>
> Q3 to Q5 signal.
>
>
> 73's
>
> Paul-Henrik / OH1LSQ
> Vaasa / KP03SD
>
>



Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm



=20 --0-144611375-1226100188=:94319--