Return-Path: Received: from rly-md06.mx.aol.com (rly-md06.mail.aol.com [172.20.29.144]) by air-md07.mail.aol.com (v121_r3.13) with ESMTP id MAILINMD073-910490174a315a; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 03:09:48 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-md06.mx.aol.com (v121_r3.13) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMD068-910490174a315a; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 03:09:25 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1KtGmX-0007yg-AF for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:08:25 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1KtGmW-0007yX-MX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:08:24 +0100 Received: from smtp5.freeserve.com ([193.252.22.151] helo=smtp6.freeserve.com) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KtGmV-0005as-A4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:08:24 +0100 Received: from smtp6.freeserve.com (mwinf3506 [10.232.28.34]) by mwinf3520.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 5E62A1C0040E for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:51:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3506.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 44F057000085 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:50:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from AGB (unknown [91.109.15.42]) by mwinf3506.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with SMTP id BDF437000084 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:50:47 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20081023185047778.BDF437000084@mwinf3506.me.freeserve.com Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: <005401c93157$a8203a90$6401a8c0@asus> <00D6E9FD969E46C9B3983B8076E9D9C1@DennisPC> <66A641F5B60A40E8A0758CF5E0B68EE7@AGB> <0F37281741714A1B86C48E1EF86E47A6@DennisPC> In-Reply-To: <0F37281741714A1B86C48E1EF86E47A6@DennisPC> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:50:47 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.5027.908 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.5027.908 X-Karma: -140: lashback.ubl=-140.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: Re: RTTY QSO 500 KHz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0025_01C93548.A48D7060" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: domain : post.thorcom.com ; SPF_helo = n X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: domain : g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk ; SPF_822_from = n ------=_NextPart_000_0025_01C93548.A48D7060 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dennis,,, We are 147 miles apart ... so Birmingham is half way and inside your 70 =20= miles or so 'ground wave' coverage .which accounts for the good trace ther= e .... how do you do at Glasgow ? (check the grabber page on uk500khz for=20= links) =20 G0NBD/P =20 I wonder .. the qth rings a bell ... I was portable located at Turvey over t= he weekend of the rsgb - hfc , I took the racal-syncal30 set and the 30 f= t fishing pole ... did we work on top band ? ... i called into a net on 194= 9 a couple of times ... didn't do too well, but I am sure there was a stat= ion there .. or on 80 .spent a lot of time calling !... I can here the net=20= up in Wallasey but local noise is very high .... 73 Graham ..=20 From: DENNIS EASTERLING=20 Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 12:02 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: Re: RTTY QSO 500 KHz Hi Graham I suddenly noticed your other query, my location is Biggleswade, locator IO9= 2UC. 73 Dennis M0JXM ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Graham=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 10:03 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: RTTY QSO 500 KHz Dennis, Interesting on the rtty contact, what method are you using for 'tx' ? What is your locator square ? you may be in the 'dead zone' in terns of di= stance , Gary and myself are roughly the same distance north , but after 70=20= miles or so ,there is a 'dead zone' till about 200 , I don't know, may be a=20= band 100 miles wide after that, that's a problem with the band and as you ca= n see at 600 miles, signals show up quite well at Shetland, while not showi= ng at Glasgow=20 I posted this 18/10 , : was that you on cw ?=20 Seeing a very low signal on 502.350 no audio .. looks like a cw cq call ?= 60 second tx with 'gap'=20 35 ft top load .. no atu ... ft897-d atten 'on'=20 G=20 G0NBD IO83LK=20 From: DENNIS EASTERLING=20 Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 5:54 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: LF: Re: RTTY QSO 500 KHz Hi Gary You may have heared me using RTTY on the 18th as I had a QSO with Chris G3= XIZ earlier which went wrong, and was testing my TX later during your QSO wi= th him. My main problem is that I appear to be getting our reasonably well= , but not so good on receive so didn't hear you. Sorry about that. I am working on the receive problem which is probably=20= due to high QRN at my location. 73 Dennis M0JXM ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Gary - G4WGT=20 To: LF -RSGB LF Group=20 Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2008 8:28 PM Subject: LF: RTTY QSO 500 KHz Hi LF, =20 Just had a good RTTY QSO with Chris G3XIZ. =20 Is there any other station can use RTTY, 45 Baud, 85 Hz shift ? =20 Please look for my CQ calls on 503.600 KHz =20 73, =20 Gary - G4WGT - IO83QP. =20 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------= -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com=20 Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.2/1739 - Release Date: 10/22/2008= 07:23 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com=20 Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.2/1739 - Release Date: 10/22/2008 0= 7:23 ------=_NextPart_000_0025_01C93548.A48D7060 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dennis,,,
 
We are  147 miles apart ... so =20 Birmingham is half way and inside your  70  miles or so=20  'ground wave'  coverage .which accounts for the good trace=20 there .... how do  you do  at Glasgow ? (check the grabber pa= ge=20 on uk500khz for links)  
 
G0NBD/P  
 
I wonder .. the qth rings a bell ... I was=20= portable=20 located at Turvey over the weekend  of the rsgb - hfc , I took the=20 racal-syncal30  set and the 30  ft fishing pole ... did we work on= top=20 band ? ... i called into  a net on 1949 a couple of times ... didn't=20 do  too well, but I am  sure there was a station there .. or=20= on=20 80 .spent a lot of time calling  !... I can here the net up =20= in=20 Wallasey but local noise is  very  high ....
 
73
 
Graham ..
 
 
 
 

Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: RTTY QSO 500 KHz

Hi Graham
 
I suddenly noticed your other query, my loc= ation is=20 Biggleswade, locator IO92UC.
 
73 Dennis M0JXM
----- Original Message -----
Graham
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 1= 0:03=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: RTTY QSO 500=20 KHz

Dennis,
 
Interesting on the rtty contact, what met= hod are=20 you using for 'tx' ?
 
What is your locator square ? you may be=20= in the=20 'dead zone' in terns of distance , Gary and myself are roughly the same=20 distance north , but after 70 miles or so ,there is a 'dead zone' till abo= ut=20 200 , I don't know, may be a band 100 miles wide after that, that's a prob= lem=20 with the band and as you can see at 600 miles, signals show up  quite= =20 well at Shetland, while not showing at Glasgow
 
 
 
I posted this 18/10 , :  was th= at you=20 on cw ?
 
Seeing a very  low signal on 502.350= no=20 audio .. looks like a cw cq call ?  60 second tx with 'gap'
 
35 ft top load .. no atu ... ft897-d = ; atten=20 'on'
 
G
 
G0NBD
 
IO83LK

Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 5:54 PM
Subject: LF: Re: RTTY QSO 500 KHz

Hi Gary
 
You may have heared me using RTTY on the=20= 18th as=20 I had a QSO with Chris G3XIZ earlier which went wrong, and was testing my=20= TX=20 later during your QSO with him.   My main problem is that I appe= ar=20 to be getting our reasonably well, but not so good on receive so didn't he= ar=20 you.
Sorry about that.   I am workin= g on the=20 receive problem which is probably due to high QRN at my location.
 
73 Dennis M0JXM
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2008=20= 8:28=20 PM
Subject: LF: RTTY QSO 500 KHz

Hi=20 LF,

 

Just had a=20 good RTTY QSO with Chris G3XIZ.

 

Is there any=20 other station can use RTTY, 45 Baud, 85 Hz shift=20 ?

 

Please look=20 for my CQ calls on 503.600 KHz

 

73,=

 

Gary - G4WGT -=20 IO83QP.

 


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG -=20 http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.2/1739 -=20 Release Date: 10/22/2008 07:23


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG -=20 http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.2/1739 - Rel= ease=20 Date: 10/22/2008 07:23
------=_NextPart_000_0025_01C93548.A48D7060--